Coronial
VIChospital

Finding into death of Bernas Hasibuan

Deceased

Bernas Hasibuan

Demographics

50y, male

Coroner

Coroner Peter White

Date of death

2010-11-16

Finding date

2016-09-15

Cause of death

gastrointestinal haemorrhage; haemorrhage from cystic artery post laparoscopic cholecystectomy

AI-generated summary

A 50-year-old man died from gastrointestinal haemorrhage involving both a cystic artery and duodenal defect following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Over five days post-surgery, he developed repeated episodes of hypotension, declining haemoglobin, and gastrointestinal bleeding that were not appropriately escalated. Critical failures included: non-activation of MET calls when systolic BP fell below 90 on three separate occasions; misattribution of bleeding to diverticular disease rather than post-operative complications; inadequate investigation of suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding with gastroscopy not performed when clinically indicated; incomplete handover of clinical information between teams; poor documentation by senior clinicians; and failure of the supervising surgeon to receive crucial information about deterioration. A gastroscopy on days 2-4 post-operation would likely have identified the bleeding source, enabling earlier laparotomy and potentially life-saving intervention.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general surgeryintensive caregastroenterology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

acute cholecystitisgastrointestinal haemorrhagehypovolemiahypotensioncystic artery injuryduodenal perforationpost-operative bleedingdiverticular diseasetype 2 diabetes

Procedures

laparoscopic cholecystectomycolonoscopyCT cholangiogramCT angiogramultrasoundERCPblood transfusion

Contributing factors

  • failure to escalate severe hypotension (systolic <90) to MET call on three occasions
  • failure to activate MET call criteria despite documented hypotension on 11 November and 15 November
  • misdiagnosis of bleeding as diverticular disease rather than post-operative complication
  • failure to perform gastroscopy when upper GI bleeding suspected
  • inadequate investigation of unexplained haemoglobin drop from 130 to 78
  • failure to use gastrointestinal bleeding protocol
  • use of haemodilution as explanation for blood loss rather than ordering transfusion
  • incomplete communication between surgical teams and senior clinician
  • poor handover between night and day teams
  • inadequate clinical documentation by senior surgeon
  • failure of supervising surgeon to receive crucial information about patient deterioration
  • surgical separation of adherent duodenum from friable gallbladder with unrecognised consequential injury
  • inappropriate discharge of clinical responsibility to incoming team without MET escalation

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implementation of mandatory MET call activation when systolic blood pressure falls below 90, removing discretionary override by treating team
  2. Adoption of gastrointestinal bleeding protocol when upper GI bleeding is suspected post-operatively
  3. Performance of gastroscopy to locate bleeding source when dark per rectal bleeding occurs with hypotension and declining haemoglobin
  4. Improved escalation of care guidelines with mandatory activation rather than clinical discretion
  5. Enhanced supervision of newly appointed junior medical officers, particularly regarding MET call criteria and escalation decisions
  6. Improved clinical documentation and note-taking by senior clinicians during patient reviews
  7. Structured handover processes between shifts and teams to ensure critical clinical information is communicated
  8. Ensuring supervising surgeons are informed of significant deterioration in their patients' condition
  9. Use of comprehensive observation charting and regular haemoglobin monitoring in post-operative patients with unexplained deterioration
  10. Implementation of family communication pathway to allow family members to report concerns about patient deterioration
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.