Coronial
VICcommunity

Finding into death of Vontharasmey Ban

Deceased

Vontharasmey Ban

Demographics

25y, male

Date of death

2009-08-14

Finding date

2013-10-10

Cause of death

Atlanto-occipital dislocation

AI-generated summary

A 25-year-old male died in a high-speed motor vehicle collision following a police pursuit. He was driving at 204 kph when he lost control and crashed into retail shops, sustaining an atlanto-occipital dislocation (fatal neck injury). His blood alcohol concentration was 0.16-0.18, which significantly impairs driving ability and likely contributed to his reckless driving and loss of control. The police pursuit lasted 68 seconds over 3 km; the fatal crash occurred 3.5 km after the pursuit was terminated. The coroner found the police officer acted in accordance with Victoria Police policies. Key clinical lessons: alcohol intoxication severely impairs judgment and driving ability; high-speed driving dramatically increases collision severity and fatality risk.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • High blood alcohol concentration (0.16-0.18)
  • High-speed driving (204 kph at point of impact)
  • Loss of vehicle control
  • Evasive driving in response to police interception
  • Impaired judgment and disinhibition from alcohol

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Copy of finding provided to Coroner John Olle for his investigation into broader Victorian Police pursuit policy
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —