Coronial
WAcommunity

Inquest into the Death of David GRAY

Deceased

David Gray

Demographics

58y, male

Date of death

2023-09-22

Finding date

2026-05-27

Cause of death

Gunshot injury to the abdomen

AI-generated summary

David Gray, 58, deliberately induced police to shoot him as a means of suicide following undisclosed mental health deterioration. On 22 September 2023, he called police anonymously reporting an armed person, then presented in a Kalgoorlie laneway with a replica firearm and petrol canister. When police arrived, he ran towards them while pointing the weapon. Two officers discharged their firearms, with the second shot proving fatal. Post-mortem examination revealed the gun was a replica and David had been doused with petrol, suggesting he had contemplated alternative suicide methods including self-immolation. The coroner found the police shooting to be lawful self-defence and determined the three officers acted appropriately given the perceived threat. David had been stressed by job loss, financial concerns, and health anxiety about possible prostate cancer. The coroner made no adverse findings regarding police conduct but emphasized the importance of checking in with family and friends regarding mental health.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • mental health deterioration
  • suicidal ideation
  • health anxiety about prostate cancer
  • financial stress from job loss
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —