Multiple injuries sustained in a motorcycle incident
AI-generated summary
A 67-year-old motorcyclist died from multiple injuries sustained in a head-on motorcycle collision when he veered into oncoming traffic while travelling at approximately 119 km/h. Police investigation revealed that his motorcycle was fitted with a Crampbuster throttle control device, which testing suggested could interfere with front brake application during emergency braking. The deceased was experienced, had ridden this route routinely for four years, and had adequate time to brake and avoid collision with the truck that prompted the maneuver. Toxicology was negative. The coroner's investigation identified a potential safety issue with the Crampbuster device affecting emergency braking capability, warranting further investigation into throttle device performance and promoting adoption of advanced braking systems such as ABS in motorcycles.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
High speed motorcycle travel (approximately 119 km/h)
Motorcycle fitted with Crampbuster throttle control device
Crampbuster device potentially interfering with front brake application
Veering into oncoming traffic when approaching truck
Head-on collision with vehicle travelling at approximately 95 km/h
Motorcycle without ABS brakes
Coroner's recommendations
Consumer Affairs Victoria and the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission should take whatever action deemed necessary to address safety concerns relating to the use of Crampbuster devices by motorcyclists
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —