Hypoxic encephalopathy in the setting of recent acute myocardial infarction with coronary artery bypass grafts
AI-generated summary
Ruben Chand, a 42-year-old male, suffered a fatal hypoxic brain injury during emergency re-intubation in ICU. After an initially reasonable extubation decision, he deteriorated and required urgent re-intubation. The procedure was complicated by a poor airway view (Grade 2B-3), inadequate pre-oxygenation, failure to use a bougie despite difficulty, lack of capnography confirmation, and critically, absence of manual bag-mask ventilation between intubation attempts. The endotracheal tube was misplaced in the oesophagus for 17-22 minutes until discovered post-arrest. Key failures: consultant not notified before re-intubation (violated hospital guidelines), difficulty information from prior hospital not transferred, no failed intubation protocol implemented. Had senior clinician been present and protocols followed, death was likely preventable.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Failure to notify consultant before re-intubation attempt, violating hospital guidelines
Lack of knowledge of previous difficult intubation at Royal Melbourne Hospital
Poor airway view (Grade 2B-3) not adequately managed
Inadequate pre-oxygenation due to patient agitation
Failure to use bougie when called for, receiving introducer instead
Misplaced endotracheal tube in oesophagus for 17-22 minutes
No capnography confirmation of tube placement
Failure to implement failed intubation protocol
Absence of manual bag-mask ventilation between intubation attempts
Poor task allocation and disorganised procedure
Consultants not informed of intubation difficulties or lack of confirmation
Coroner's recommendations
When a patient is transferred from one public hospital to another, information about their intubation status and any difficulty with intubation should be recorded and conveyed to the receiving hospital
The Alfred Hospital should initiate discussions with major public health services to achieve processes for conveying critical clinical information between facilities
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.