A 43-year-old woman with prosthetic mitral and aortic valves due to rheumatic heart disease died from acute thrombosis of her prosthetic mitral valve following cessation and recommencement of warfarin for IVF treatment. A critical breakdown in communication occurred between her IVF specialist and general practitioner regarding anticoagulation management after the IVF cycle. Each clinician assumed the other was managing warfarin dosing and recommencement, and neither verified the plan directly with the patient. The patient had previous experience with perioperative anticoagulation changes, but this assumption of understanding proved dangerous. Clear communication protocols between multiple treating clinicians, explicit assignment of responsibility for anticoagulation monitoring, and patient education in lay language are essential when managing patients on critical anticoagulation therapy, particularly those with language barriers.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
cardiologyintensive carehaematologygeneral practice
Cessation and recommencement of warfarin anticoagulation therapy
Breakdown in communication between IVF specialist and general practitioner
Unclear assignment of responsibility for anticoagulation management
Undetermined warfarin dose at recommencement
Language barriers not adequately addressed
Assumption that patient understood anticoagulation plan without verification
Coroner's recommendations
Monash Private Reproductive Biology Clinic (IVF) should develop and implement a written policy for anticoagulation therapy addressing: the mechanisms for provision of healthcare information to the patient and all care providers; the type of medicine, dose and timing of administration; and assignment of responsibility for monitoring anticoagulation levels and patient adherence to the medication regime
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.