Coronial
TASother

Coroner's Finding: Walker, Danielle Kate

Deceased

Danielle Kate Walker

Demographics

26y, female

Date of death

2023-06-03

Finding date

2025-02-14

Cause of death

Multiple head, chest and limb injuries sustained in a motor vehicle crash

AI-generated summary

Danielle Kate Walker, a 26-year-old experienced driver, died in a head-on motor vehicle collision on Boyer Road, Tasmania on 3 June 2023. The crash was caused entirely by the driver of the other vehicle, Graham John Freeman, who was driving on the wrong side of the road while under the influence of methylamphetamine, fatigued from minimal sleep, and likely distracted by TikTok videos on a tablet device in his vehicle. Freeman had consumed at least 0.3g of methylamphetamine between 6pm and midnight the previous day, slept minimally (possibly not at all during his return journey), and had ample line of sight to avoid the collision. Ms Walker's vehicle had no mechanical defects and she was travelling below the speed limit. This case highlights the catastrophic consequences of drug-impaired and fatigued driving combined with in-vehicle distraction.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineforensic medicine

Drugs involved

methamphetamine

Contributing factors

  • Driver of other vehicle (Graham John Freeman) operating vehicle on wrong side of road
  • Driver of other vehicle under the influence of methylamphetamine
  • Driver of other vehicle fatigued from minimal sleep
  • Driver of other vehicle likely distracted by TikTok videos on tablet device
  • Driver of other vehicle unable to correct course despite ample line of sight (197m)
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.