Hayden Kennedy, 18, died from a head injury sustained as a passenger in a Polaris UTV driven by Thomas Rowlands. The vehicle crashed into a tree stump on a rural gravel road after Rowlands lost control negotiating a curve while travelling at approximately 96 km/h (34 km/h above safe speed for the curve, 16 km/h above the speed limit) and intoxicated (estimated BAC 0.124–0.231 g/100 mL at time of crash). Kennedy was not wearing a helmet. The crash was entirely attributable to Rowlands' dangerous driving—excessive speed and alcohol intoxication. The coroner noted that helmet use might have reduced injury severity and highlighted gaps in safety regulation for UTVs, which fall outside quad bike safety requirements despite similar risk profiles.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
forensic medicineemergency medicinetrauma surgery
Drugs involved
alcohol
Clinical conditions
head injuryalcohol intoxication
Contributing factors
driver excessive speed (96 km/h in 62 km/h safe curve speed zone)
no regulatory requirement for helmet use on UTVs at time of crash
Coroner's recommendations
Repeat Coroner Cooper's 2017 recommendation that consideration be given to the introduction of legislation requiring mandatory training and licensing of all persons using quad bikes, applied also to UTVs
Consider whether vehicles such as the UTV in this case should be included in Road Rules provisions applicable to quad bikes given their similarity, or whether they should be separately provided for
Consider extension of helmet requirements to UTV drivers and passengers on public roads, not only quad bikes
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.