sepsis due to ischemic gut due to occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery
AI-generated summary
A 73-year-old man presented with acute severe abdominal pain caused by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusion. Initial CT angiogram at 12:30am was reported as normal; the SMA occlusion was not identified until 4:45am—over 4 hours later—when surgical staff reviewed the scan. This delay meant the patient underwent exploratory laparotomy at Launceston General Hospital (LGH) rather than proceeding directly to Royal Hobart Hospital (RHH) for vascular intervention. By the time revascularisation was attempted at RHH, extensive bowel ischemia had developed, ultimately proving non-viable. The coroner found that requesting the radiologist specifically to evaluate for mesenteric ischemia before the initial CT scan might have enabled earlier diagnosis and treatment at a specialist centre, potentially improving outcome. However, given the difficulty of diagnosing acute mesenteric ischaemia and the clinical uncertainty regarding whether earlier intervention would have altered the ultimate fatal outcome, the coroner did not criticise the LGH clinicians' management.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicineradiologygeneral surgeryvascular surgeryintensive care
Error types
diagnosticcommunication
Clinical conditions
superior mesenteric artery occlusionacute mesenteric ischemiaintestinal infarctionischemic bowelsepsiscoagulopathy
delayed identification of SMA occlusion on initial CT scan
failure to communicate mesenteric ischemia as differential diagnosis to radiologist prior to scan
extended time interval (4+ hours) between initial CT and diagnosis
extensive bowel ischemia by time of revascularisation attempt
coagulopathy and sepsis
Coroner's recommendations
Hospital clinicians requesting radiological investigations should, whenever possible, bring to the attention of the radiologist all relevant differential diagnoses for investigation and reporting
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.