Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Koskovic, Emma Louise

Deceased

Emma Louise Koskovic

Demographics

35y, female

Date of death

2023-01-14

Finding date

2024-04-15

Cause of death

head injuries sustained as a driver in a single vehicle crash

AI-generated summary

Emma Louise Koskovic, 35, died from head injuries sustained in a single-vehicle crash on 14 January 2023. She was intercepted by police for speeding at 143km/h but appeared unintoxicated and was allowed to proceed. Subsequently, she purchased alcohol, consumed a considerable quantity while driving (BAC 0.222g/100ml), and entered a curve at 127km/h while distracted by phone music. She lost control and struck a tree. The coroner found police acted appropriately in not conducting random breath testing, as she showed no signs of intoxication at interception. The death resulted from her deliberate choices: continued heavy alcohol consumption, excessive speeding, and reckless driving despite police intervention. Clinical lesson: high-functioning alcoholics may effectively conceal intoxication despite significant impairment.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • high blood alcohol concentration (0.222g/100ml or greater)
  • excessive speed (127km/h in 65km/h advisory curve)
  • driver distraction (loud music in vehicle)
  • reckless driving behaviour
  • continued alcohol consumption while driving after police interception
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —