multiple pulmonary thromboemboli and deep vein thrombosis
AI-generated summary
71-year-old woman presented to ED with signs of circulatory failure (hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnoea, hypoxia) and progressive leg pain/swelling over one week. ECG showed S1Q3T3 pattern consistent with pulmonary embolism; bedside ultrasound showed right ventricular strain. Despite presumptive diagnosis of PE being made, no anticoagulation or thrombolytic therapy was initiated. Instead, staff waited for CT pulmonary angiogram, which was delayed due to absent pathology results, unfamiliar ordering systems, and lack of radiographer on-site. Patient remained ramped (in ambulance) for 8 hours due to full ED and no available beds. She arrested and died before imaging could be performed. Coroner found management was substandard; immediate anticoagulation/thrombolysis was essential and should have been given based on clinical presentation and ECG findings, regardless of definitive imaging. Multiple system failures contributed: inadequate ED orientation for new medical staff, lack of clear protocols for urgent out-of-hours pathology and radiology requests, nursing staff deficiency, and resource constraints from ramping.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
electrocardiographybedside cardiac ultrasoundpoint of care ultrasound
Contributing factors
delay in initiating anticoagulation or thrombolytic therapy
delay in CT pulmonary angiogram due to absent pathology results
unfamiliarity with electronic ordering system (TrakED)
lack of radiographer on-site overnight
failure to call pathologist for urgent out-of-hours testing
failure to call radiographer regarding urgent imaging request
absence of previous health records
inadequate medical staff orientation to emergency department protocols
inadequate ED orientation regarding escalation criteria
nursing staff deficiency (5 staff short)
ED at capacity with 25 patients
patient ramped for 8 hours without bed availability
severity of illness underestimated
Coroner's recommendations
Review of ED orientation program for new medical staff to include roles and responsibilities of clinicians for patients in transfer of care delay
Process for calling pathologists for urgent testing, both within and out of hours, be documented in a protocol or guideline and be included in new medical staff orientation to the emergency department
Consider the feasibility of 24-hour on-site medical imaging practitioners at the hospital
Emergency department to review medical staff orientation to include key work processes such as how to request urgent diagnostic tests out of hours
Emergency department staff responsible for calling the on-call consultant when escalation criteria are met receive refresher education on these requirements
Provide read-only access to TrakED to all medical imaging staff to assist with workflow and to ensure all requests are actioned in a timely manner
Protocol or guideline be developed by the pathology department that outlines requesting processes, both within and out of hours, for urgent and non-urgent pathology testing
After-hours medical imaging request protocol be updated to include differing referral methods (paper-based or electronic) and follow-up requirements for requesting urgent diagnostic radiological tests
THS should address ramping and propose solutions to resolve this issue
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.