Coronial
TAShospital

Coroner's Finding: Carroll, Terence John

Deceased

Terence John Carroll

Demographics

71y, male

Date of death

2019-06-08

Finding date

2022-10-26

Cause of death

sepsis caused by mediastinal empyema (abscess) which complicated perforation of the oesophagus that occurred during rigid oesophagoscopy

AI-generated summary

Terence Carroll, 71, died from sepsis and mediastinal empyema following oesophageal perforation during rigid oesophagoscopy for stricture dilation. Critical failures included: CT scan showing suspicious oesophageal thickening was not communicated to the surgeon before the procedure; cancer (adenocarcinoma) was not definitively excluded pre-operatively; diagnosis of perforation was delayed at the referring hospital (22 hours delay from presentation to CTPA confirmation); and the patient was discharged same-day despite being frail, cognitively impaired, hypotensive, and post-operative vital signs indicating instability. The coroner found substandard practice in both the information flow failure and the delayed diagnosis. While oesophageal rupture is a recognised procedural risk and the surgeon was experienced, earlier diagnosis and overnight admission for observation would have enabled timely intervention.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

ENT surgerygeneral surgerygastroenterologyintensive careemergency medicineanaesthesiapalliative care

Error types

communicationdiagnosticdelayprocedural

Clinical conditions

oesophageal strictureoesophageal adenocarcinomaoesophageal perforationmediastinitissepsishydropneumothoraxpleural effusionemphysemachronic obstructive pulmonary diseasehyponatraemiaAlzheimer's diseasechronic alcohol dependence

Procedures

rigid oesophagoscopyoesophageal dilationSavary-Gilliard dilationchest drain insertionoesophageal stent placementvideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Contributing factors

  • oesophageal adenocarcinoma
  • emphysema
  • chronic alcoholism
  • failure to communicate CT scan findings to surgeon
  • failure to definitively exclude malignancy before dilation
  • delay in diagnosis of oesophageal perforation at referring hospital
  • same-day discharge despite post-operative instability and patient frailty
  • absence of post-operative vital sign monitoring before discharge
  • improper positioning of guidewire during dilation
  • patient cachexia and poor physical state

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Careful selection of patients for oesophageal dilation procedure with frailty assessment using approved tools such as the Carlson Fragility Index
  2. Ensure all relevant pathology and diagnostic imaging results are available at pre-admission clinic and to treating clinicians before procedure
  3. Refer to multidisciplinary team for case assessment and planning when malignancy is suspected or confirmed
  4. Adequate characterisation of stricture characteristics including location, underlying pathology, and length/complexity before dilation
  5. Initial procedure should include biopsy and histological confirmation where high suspicion for malignancy exists
  6. Purchase ultraslim flexible gastroscopes and provide formal training to staff
  7. Ensure guidewire tip is appropriately located and remains in correct location during procedure via direct sight or fluoroscopy
  8. Defer procedure or refer to another facility if necessary equipment is not available
  9. Admit frail patients overnight if vital signs are unstable before discharge or if pain increases post-operatively
  10. Consult with state-wide endoscopy network to develop appropriate procedures and guidelines
  11. Close post-operative monitoring of frail patients before discharge
  12. Patients presenting to referring hospital within 24-48 hours post-surgery should be assessed by treating surgical team and transferred to appropriate facility
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.