pulmonary thromboembolism due to left deep vein thrombosis
AI-generated summary
A 56-year-old man died from pulmonary thromboembolism secondary to deep vein thrombosis. He presented to his GP on 20 January 2017 with persistent dyspnoea and chest pain following a 22-hour flight to Greece and respiratory infection there. The GP diagnosed heart failure exacerbated by chronic lung disease and obesity but did not consider PE as a differential diagnosis. No D-dimer was ordered. The coroner found that application of standardised PE evaluation criteria (Wells score and PERC) would have mandated D-dimer testing given the patient's age >50 and heart rate >100 bpm. A positive D-dimer would likely have led to urgent CTPA, detection of PE, and anticoagulation therapy, offering the best prospect of survival. The case highlights the diagnostic challenge of PE and the value of systematic risk stratification tools in general practice.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general practicecardiologyvascular surgerypathology
Medical practitioners, particularly those in general practice, should familiarise themselves with and apply the guide for evaluation of suspected PE set out in the 2018 RACP research paper 'Update on Diagnosis and Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism' published in the Internal Medicine Journal
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.