Coronial
TAScommunity

Coroner's Finding: Shayler-Appleton, Gemma Louise

Deceased

Gemma Louise Shayler-Appleton

Demographics

35y, female

Date of death

2016-12-21

Finding date

2018-06-20

Cause of death

Multiple injuries from motor vehicle strike

AI-generated summary

Gemma Louise Shayler-Appleton, aged 35, died from multiple injuries sustained when struck by a motor vehicle on a dark country road in Tasmania. She was changing seats in a parked vehicle when struck by a Mazda van travelling at 90 km/h. The driver had a blood alcohol level of 0.098 g/200mL breath but this alone did not cause the crash. Poor visibility due to darkness, dark clothing, parked vehicles obscuring the road view, and insufficient reaction time (1.998 seconds versus standard 2.5-3 seconds for night driving) were contributing factors. The injuries were massive and rapidly fatal. This case highlights risks of roadside activities in low-visibility conditions on high-speed roads.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • Darkness and lack of street lighting
  • Deceased wearing dark clothing
  • Parked vehicles on roadway reducing visibility and creating impression of blocked road
  • Insufficient perception/reaction time for driver (1.998 seconds versus standard 2.5-3 seconds for night driving)
  • High speed country road (100 km/h speed limit)
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —