sepsis and multiple organ failure attributable to infarction/necrosis of small bowel due to superior mesenteric artery thrombus
AI-generated summary
A 53-year-old woman with Type II diabetes, obesity, and Korsakoff dementia presented with acute severe abdominal pain from superior mesenteric artery (SMA) thrombosis at 3:00 AM on 19 August. Despite elevated lactate, metabolic acidosis, leukocytosis, and severe pain, the diagnosis was not made for 25+ hours. The CT scan at 9:00 AM failed to identify the occluded SMA. The patient underwent a non-diagnostic laparoscopy at 6:00 PM. Diagnosis was made at a radiology meeting at 8:30 AM on 20 August—36 hours after symptom onset—when a colorectal surgeon identified the SMA occlusion on review. The patient was transferred from Launceston General Hospital to Royal Hobart Hospital instead of receiving surgery locally. Surgery began at 7:06 PM on 20 August (40 hours after onset). Despite thrombectomy and bowel resection, the patient developed extensive small bowel necrosis and died on 27 August from sepsis and multiple organ failure. Key failures: failure to consider mesenteric ischaemia in differential diagnosis, missed radiological diagnosis, vascular surgeon's decision not to treat locally despite availability and urgency, delays in transfer, and delays in pre-operative assessment at RHH.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
emergency medicinegeneral surgeryvascular surgeryradiologycolorectal surgeryintensive care
Error types
diagnosticdelaysystemcommunication
Clinical conditions
superior mesenteric artery thrombosismesenteric ischaemiasmall bowel infarctionsmall bowel necrosissepsismultiple organ failuremetabolic acidosisType II diabetesobesityKorsakoff dementiaacute abdominal pain
Procedures
laparoscopylaparotomythrombectomybowel resectionCT angiographyCT scanabdominal and pelvic imaging
Contributing factors
failure to identify mesenteric ischaemia as differential diagnosis in ED and early assessment
radiologist's failure to identify occluded superior mesenteric artery on CT scan
missed diagnosis on initial CT referral form which did not mention SMA occlusion as differential
non-diagnostic laparoscopy which did not conclusively identify ischaemia
vascular surgeon's decision to transfer patient to RHH rather than treat at LGH despite proximity and availability
delay in requesting ambulance transfer (1 hour 43 minutes after transfer accepted)
delay in dispatching ambulance (1 hour 39 minutes after arrival at LGH)
delay in commencing surgery at RHH (5 hours after arrival)
failure of medical staff to escalate overnight despite severe persistent pain and MET call requirement
Type II diabetes
obesity
chronic alcohol dependence
subsequent thrombosis of SMA identified at post-mortem
Coroner's recommendations
Tasmanian Health Service should carry out a review of the circumstances of Mrs Forward's transfer which may identify shortcomings in the patient transport system and facilitate improvements
Improve awareness among ED clinicians and surgical registrars of mesenteric ischaemia as a differential diagnosis in acute abdominal pain presentations, particularly in older patients
Radiologists should consider mesenteric ischaemia and SMA occlusion in their differential diagnoses when reviewing CT scans for acute abdominal pain, particularly when clinical history indicates risk factors
Vascular surgery services should establish protocols to enable urgent treatment of mesenteric ischaemia at regional hospitals when a vascular surgeon is available and the clinical situation is time-critical
Review and improve efficiency of inter-hospital transfer processes to minimize delays in transporting patients with time-critical surgical emergencies
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.