Coronial
SAcommunity

Coroner's Finding: Chua, Ardebby Oh

Deceased

Ardebby Oh Chua

Demographics

41y, female

Date of death

2017-12-28

Finding date

2024-01-23

Cause of death

salt water drowning

AI-generated summary

Ms Ardebby Chua, a 41-year-old woman with no snorkelling experience, died from salt water drowning during a guided snorkelling tour near Blyth Island, South Australia. She aspirated water triggering laryngospasm and became unresponsive within minutes of last observation. Critical clinical lessons include: inadequate pre-tour risk assessment of swimming ability; insufficient tailored safety briefing for inexperienced swimmers; failure to provide suitable buoyancy vests despite availability; critically, 18-30 minutes elapsed before retrieval to the boat for effective CPR on a hard surface—delaying resuscitation that should have occurred within minutes. No practised in-water rescue procedure existed. Absent supplemental oxygen further diminished survival chances. While death was not preventable on balance of probabilities, earlier boat retrieval with proper emergency protocols may have prevented it. The case demonstrates need for structured risk management, rapid extrication protocols, emergency oxygen, and proper resuscitation surfaces in aquatic activities.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinediving medicineoccupational and environmental health

Error types

systemcommunicationdelayprocedural

Clinical conditions

laryngospasmsalt water aspirationhypoxiacardiac arrestdrowningmild diabetes (unmedicated)

Procedures

cardiopulmonary resuscitationin-water rescue

Contributing factors

  • no prior snorkelling experience
  • inadequate pre-tour swimming ability assessment
  • perfunctory safety briefing not tailored to inexperienced swimmers
  • inadequate snorkelling demonstration on water entry
  • pool noodle flotation device separated from deceased
  • no buoyancy vests offered to weak swimmers
  • water aspiration triggering laryngospasm
  • delayed retrieval from water (18-30 minutes)
  • ineffective CPR on unstable surface (muster rock)
  • no practised in-water rescue procedure
  • absence of supplemental oxygen on vessel
  • no surfboard/backboard available for emergency retrieval

Coroner's recommendations

  1. That the carriage of oxygen should be mandatory for persons operating commercial snorkelling tours
  2. That the carriage of an Automated External Defibrillator should be mandatory for persons operating commercial snorkelling tours
  3. That SafeWork SA conduct an audit of snorkelling tours in South Australia and report to the Coroners Court on its findings
  4. That SafeWork SA advise the Coroner of the extent to which operators within South Australia are compliant with the SafeWork SA Snorkel Safety Guidelines and whether SafeWork SA are of the view that the current legislation allows them to enforce any incidence of non-compliance
  5. That persons operating commercial snorkelling tours consider the purchase and placement of defibrillators within their workplaces where patrons are undertaking snorkelling activities
  6. That legislation be introduced requiring all businesses conducting snorkelling activities to carry an emergency oxygen unit as part of their first aid supplies and that operators ensure that there is always a member of staff available who is appropriately trained to administer oxygen
  7. That legislation be introduced requiring all businesses conducting snorkelling activities to carry an Automated External Defibrillator
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.