metastatic adenocarcinomatosis with unknown primary source
AI-generated summary
A 58-year-old prisoner died of metastatic adenocarcinoma with unknown primary. In September 2006, significantly abnormal liver enzymes (GGT 2093) and hyperglycemia were detected. A December 2006 ultrasound identified an indeterminate liver lesion. Rather than pursuing specialist referral or further investigation as recommended, the treating GP adopted a 'wait and see' approach with repeat imaging planned for 6-12 months, citing the patient's reluctance to travel to Adelaide. No documentation of this refusal was recorded. The patient was not explicitly counselled about cancer as a possibility. By June 2007, he presented with metastatic cancer throughout his liver, bones and spine—by which time curative treatment was impossible. An independent oncologist opined the death was potentially preventable had the liver lesion been promptly investigated in 2006. Key failures: inadequate communication of risk, lack of documentation of patient refusal, passive acceptance of patient reluctance without firm advocacy, and inadequate continuity of care in the prison health system.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general practiceoncologypalliative carecorrectional health
CT scan of abdomenultrasound of liverCT pulmonary angiogramMRI of spinefine needle biopsy of liver
Contributing factors
failure to pursue specialist referral for indeterminate liver lesion identified in December 2006
adoption of passive 'wait and see' approach rather than prompt investigation
inadequate explanation to patient of cancer risk and consequences of non-investigation
lack of documentation of patient's stated refusal to travel to Adelaide
failure to adequately counsel patient on worst-case scenarios
poor continuity of care between privately practising GPs and prison health service
absence of senior medical oversight of serious/life-threatening illnesses in prisoners
Coroner's recommendations
Medical Director of South Australian Prison Health Service should assign a senior medical officer responsibility for oversight of medical treatment and investigation of prisoners suspected of serious or life-threatening illness, especially where treatment is provided by non-Service practitioners
Medical practitioners treating prisoners should carefully explain to reluctant patients the possible consequences of failure to undergo important medical treatment or investigation, including identification of worst-case scenarios
Medical practitioners should make detailed notations in clinical records of decisions by prisoners to refuse recommended treatment or investigation, including stated reasons
Medical Director and CEO of Department for Correctional Services should recognise that prisoner refusal to travel to Adelaide does not prevent compulsory transfer and escort
Medical Director and CEO should ensure that conditions enjoyed by prisoners in country facilities are not jeopardised by necessity of travel to Adelaide for medical treatment or investigation
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.