Severe cardiogenic shock complicating cardiac surgery
AI-generated summary
An 81-year-old woman died of severe cardiogenic shock following elective aortic valve replacement complicated by intraoperative haemodynamic instability and inadequate postoperative ICU management. The surgery involved emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and was technically sound, but a small left coronary artery tear of uncertain aetiology developed intraoperatively. Critically, the ICU registrar changed the inotropic regime from vasodilating adrenaline to vasoconstricting noradrenaline without consulting the senior intensivist or surgical team, and without inserting a Swan-Ganz catheter to monitor the haemodynamic consequences. The senior intensivist was not present at handover and was not called until 0210 hours, by which time critical decisions had been made. The initial cause of death determination (aortic dissection) was incorrect. Clinical lessons include the importance of consultant-level involvement in complex post-surgical ICU cases, junior medical staff escalating to seniors before changing critical drug regimens, and haemodynamic monitoring during significant inotropic regime changes.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Intraoperative haemodynamic instability of uncertain aetiology
Small left main coronary artery tear (2mm) at ostium
Change from low-dose adrenaline to noradrenaline by ICU registrar without senior consultation
Inadequate haemodynamic monitoring in ICU (no Swan-Ganz catheter)
Lack of senior intensivist presence at handover and delayed involvement in care
Global myocardial ischaemia secondary to left main coronary stenosis and right coronary artery occlusion
Prolonged bypass and cross-clamp time during initial surgery and subsequent reoperations
Lactic acidosis and severe metabolic derangement on ICU admission
Coroner's recommendations
ICU staff involved in cardiac surgery post-operative care should attend regular mortality and morbidity meetings held by the Cardiac Unit
Cardiac Unit and ICU heads, together with senior management, should address communication issues between the Cardiac Unit and ICU
It should be mandatory for ICU staff to confer with members of the surgical team before altering a drug regime chosen by the surgical team that is still being administered at handover to ICU
Flinders Medical Centre should review protocols and policies on communication between junior ICU staff and consultant intensivists with the aim of improving patient care and continuity of care
Flinders Medical Centre should review protocols and policies on the attendance of consultant intensivists at ICU with a view to requiring a consultant intensivist to attend a patient admitted to ICU in circumstances where they are not otherwise present at handover
It should be mandatory for the on-call consultant intensivist to be directly involved in a patient's management plan on admission, whether by telephone or in person, depending upon the complexity and seriousness of the patient's condition upon admission
Flinders Medical Centre should review protocols and policies on completing the Death Report to Coroner to ensure that the medical practitioner directly involved in the patient's care completes the deposition
Flinders Medical Centre should review protocols and policies on record keeping, particularly in respect of anaesthetic and ICU charts, to minimise ambiguities and handwritten records requiring interpretation, and ensure drugs are recorded clearly with precise dosages and times administered
Flinders Medical Centre should review protocols and policies in relation to the use of Swan-Ganz catheters
All Flinders Medical Centre ICU staff should receive training on the insertion of Swan-Ganz catheters to ensure patients who require haemodynamic monitoring receive the appropriate level of care
The adequacy of Flinders Medical Centre's credentialling of existing doctors and other medical staff should be reviewed and the circumstances surrounding credentialling in late 2009 should be investigated by an appropriate independent authority
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.