sepsis due to faecal peritonitis due to perforation of sigmoid colon complicating left oophorectomy for benign serous cystadenoma of left ovary
AI-generated summary
A 59-year-old woman died from sepsis due to faecal peritonitis following a bowel perforation during laparoscopic oophorectomy for a benign ovarian cyst. The perforation was repaired during the initial surgery, but the repair failed. The patient deteriorated at home and was readmitted. The primary issue was delay in performing emergency re-operation: the patient was scheduled for surgery at 9am but not operated until 8am the following day, by which time she was in septic shock. Expert evidence overwhelmingly supported that surgery should have been performed within 2-3 hours of admission (late Saturday evening or early Sunday morning), after brief resuscitation with fluids and antibiotics. The delay exposed the patient to preventable deterioration. While earlier surgery may not have guaranteed survival, her chances would have been significantly better in a more stable clinical state. Critical factors included failure to arrange early surgery, lack of ICU admission, and absence of a second medical opinion.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Findings be drawn to attention of chief executives of Department of Health, South Australian Medical Association, and South Australian Medical Board
Chief executives advise medical professionals that in cases of suspected faecal peritonitis, they should: (a) avoid or minimise delay in surgery; (b) identify a point at which optimal resuscitation has been achieved and further resuscitation would be futile; (c) recognise risk of acute deterioration in apparently stable patients; (d) consider worst case scenario; (e) consider admission/transfer to hospital with intensive care unit prior to surgery; (f) consider obtaining second medical opinion on clinical management
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.