sepsis secondary to extensive acute peritonitis following perforation of small bowel wall
AI-generated summary
43-year-old woman died from sepsis and necrotising fasciitis following small bowel perforation during laparoscopic tubal ligation. She was at high risk due to previous abdominal surgeries and adhesions. A 4-5mm perforation occurred during the procedure but was not detected intraoperatively. Post-operatively, she presented with severe pain requiring narcotic analgesia within 24 hours—a red flag for bowel injury. Despite fluctuating clinical course, peritonitis and bowel perforation were not recognised until late (day 6), when bowel contents began draining from the umbilical wound. Had a laparotomy been performed on day 1-2 based on clinical suspicion, earlier intervention might have prevented progression to overwhelming sepsis. The coroner emphasised maintaining high index of suspicion for bowel injury post-laparoscopy, particularly in high-risk patients, and noted that post-operative pain should be assumed bowel damage until proven otherwise.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
gynaecologyanaesthesiageneral surgeryintensive care
Error types
diagnosticdelay
Clinical conditions
small bowel perforationacute peritonitisnecrotising fasciitisabdominal adhesionssepsisbowel fistulasurgical emphysema
Procedures
laparoscopic tubal ligationlaparotomyperitoneal lavagedebridement of necrotic tissue
Contributing factors
small bowel perforation during laparoscopic tubal ligation
pre-existing abdominal adhesions from previous surgery
failure to recognise peritonitis and bowel damage early post-operatively
delayed laparotomy (6 days post-operation)
widespread necrotising fasciitis of anterior abdominal wall
conservative management despite red flag symptoms
inadequate intraoperative inspection for bowel damage
Coroner's recommendations
Gynaecologists using laparoscopic surgery should be reminded of the small but appreciable risk of damage to bowel and/or major blood vessels
Patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgery are at significantly increased risk of bowel damage and suitability for laparoscopic surgery should be carefully considered
Alternative entry sites to the abdominal cavity should be considered if adhesions are suspected
Any unusual symptomatology after laparoscopic surgery should give rise to a 'very high index of suspicion' that bowel or blood vessel damage may have occurred and that laparotomy may be indicated
The need for early intervention in cases of suspected bowel injury should be borne in mind
Surgeons should consider routine inspection of bowel at conclusion of laparoscopic procedure in high-risk patients
Patients and doctors should expect progressive and maintained improvement after laparoscopic surgery; increasing pain or vomiting should alert to real risk of complications
Increasing pain should be assumed to be a consequence of bowel damage until proven otherwise
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.