uncontrolled haemorrhage from ruptured aortic aneurysm
AI-generated summary
A 63-year-old man presented with sudden back pain on 6 March 2004. Ambulance officers attended twice; on the first visit they did not transport him to hospital despite his request, misattributing his symptoms to musculoskeletal back pain. Critically, when new symptoms of suprapubic and epigastric pain developed en route to hospital on the second callout, the attending ambulance officer failed to communicate this to the triage nurse. The patient was triaged as category four (2+ hour wait) based only on chronic back pain. He was not fully assessed until discovered to be pale, sweaty, and pulseless on examination in the emergency department cubicle, at which point he was rushed to theatre. He died from uncontrolled haemorrhage from a ruptured aortic aneurysm. Key failures: inadequate physical examination at first attendance, failure to escalate when new abdominal symptoms emerged, and critical handover failure to triage.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
failure to perform adequate physical examination at first ambulance attendance
failure to take blood pressure measurement despite request, relying on radial pulse alone
inadequate assessment and dismissal of symptoms as musculoskeletal
failure to recognise significance of new symptoms (suprapubic and epigastric pain) developing en route to hospital
failure of ambulance officer to communicate new abdominal pain symptoms to triage nurse at handover
low triage priority assigned (category 4) based on incomplete handover information
patient not triaged for imaging or abdominal assessment
delayed recognition of shock physiology (pallor, sweating, absent pulses) until arrival in ED cubicle
unsympathetic approach by ambulance officer may have discouraged patient from insisting on hospital transport at first attendance
Coroner's recommendations
Establish a system whereby the triage assist nurse has responsibility to chase up the patient case card from the ambulance service and ensure it is obtained before the first half-hourly observations are carried out
If the case card reveals that the triage category was inappropriate, or if the case card together with observations suggest inappropriateness, the nurse assist should alter the triage category or ask the triage nurse to reconsider it
Ensure that ambulance case cards reliably reach the triage nurse and are reviewed before triage assignment
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.