massive acute haemolysis leading to severe anaemia and multi-system failure as a result of an incompatible blood transfusion
AI-generated summary
Ruth Stoll, 71, died from massive acute haemolysis and multi-system failure after receiving incompatible blood transfusions during aortic aneurysm repair. Pre-operative blood samples from Stoll and another patient (Kovendy) were inadvertently mislabelled by a registered nurse during collection, resulting in Stoll receiving Group A blood when she was actually Group O. The nurse failed to follow the established Nurse Procedure Manual requiring patients to spell their names—a safeguard that would have prevented the mix-up. Post-operative clinicians could not have detected this error even if casenotes were available. Key lessons: strict adherence to patient identification protocols during specimen collection is critical; independent verification at collection time (not just transfusion) is essential; centralised blood group databases and witness involvement of carers during collection could prevent such errors.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
blood samplingblood typing and cross-matchingblood transfusion
Contributing factors
mislabelling of blood samples during pre-operative collection
failure to comply with Nurse Procedure Manual requiring patient to spell their name
absence of double-checking at time of specimen collection
inadequate patient identification procedures during phlebotomy
Coroner's recommendations
Guidelines developed by the Australian New Zealand Society of Blood Transfusions Inc, particularly in relation to blood grouping and cross-matching request forms, should be adopted by all organisations engaged in blood testing
A central blood group computer database should be examined further by the Department of Human Services, with potential interstate links and addressing privacy concerns
Protocols for blood collection should encourage collectors to have a relative or carer present where possible to reduce the risk of communication difficulties with the patient
New request forms for grouping and cross-matching should include specific certification that samples were labelled immediately and proper identification undertaken, with signatures from both collector and witness
Double-checking of specimens and patient identification at time of sample collection should be implemented, either by one staff member with the patient or by two staff members
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.