Wayne Mark Thomson, aged 47, died by hanging on 14 February 2000. He made multiple attempts to seek help for suicidal ideation in the preceding three days, including visiting his GP, calling a crisis assessment service (EACIS), attending the Royal Adelaide Hospital ED, and receiving a home visit from EACIS workers. Each assessment failed to identify risk adequately. His GP provided a 6-month antidepressant prescription without proper assessment at their first consultation. The ED doctor dismissed a triage note of suicidality without psychiatric consultation, documenting insufficient mental state examination details. EACIS workers failed to fully explore documented warning signs including a noose found in his unit, delusional ideation, substance abuse, hepatitis C fears, and poor social supports. The coroner concluded assessment and management were inadequate and that he required specialist psychiatric input that was not provided.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
inadequate documentation of psychiatric assessment
inadequate home assessment by EACIS despite warning signs
presence of police interfering with therapeutic assessment
multiple referrals without clear diagnostic understanding
failure to contact hospital regarding concurrent ED attendance
insufficient exploration of suicidal ideation that fluctuated between contacts
failure to recognize possible psychotic features
Coroner's recommendations
Support continuation of ACIS (now EACIS) review of practices and procedures to improve worker performance and ensure early access to qualified psychiatric treatment
Develop or modify protocol between SAPOL and EACIS to provide guidance when attending premises jointly, ensuring psychiatric patients can be assured police presence is for security/support rather than law enforcement, to avoid undermining therapeutic assessment
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.