Inquest into the death of Duke Allan Wayne Schafer
Deceased
Duke Allan Wayne Schafer
Demographics
36y, male
Coroner
Ryan
Date of death
2020-05-06
Finding date
2025-10-01
Cause of death
Ligature strangulation
AI-generated summary
Duke Schafer, 36-year-old prisoner, was murdered by fellow inmate Carl Bloomfield in May 2020 at Woodford Correctional Centre. Bloomfield strangled Schafer in an unsupervised laundry area during a period when officers were conducting muster in an adjacent unit. The coroner found that while Bloomfield had been identified as a high-risk violent offender with sadistic fantasies and recommended for specialist psychological treatment and medication by sentencing judge, he consistently refused engagement. Bloomfield could not be compelled to accept treatment under mental health legislation as he did not meet criteria for involuntary treatment—he had capacity to refuse and did not have serious mental illness. Key preventability factors included: unsupervised laundry access (subsequently changed to locked with direct observation), lack of CCTV coverage in laundry (though coroner accepted direct supervision superior to camera), and staffing gaps during muster periods. QCS failed to implement adequate systems to track court-recommended treatments. The death was not preventable given Bloomfield's deliberate premeditation and choice of time/location, but infrastructure and systemic vulnerabilities were exploited.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
antisocial personality disordersubstance use disordersadistic personality traitsintellectual disability (victim)
Contributing factors
Lack of CCTV monitoring in laundry area
Limited staff visibility of laundry due to unit layout and obstructed windows
Inadequate staffing in unit during muster periods with only one officer supervising
Unsupervised laundry access for prisoners
Perpetrator's premeditation and deliberate selection of time and location
Failure to implement court-recommended specialist psychological treatment for perpetrator
Inadequate systems to track and ensure compliance with court-ordered treatment recommendations
Perpetrator's non-engagement with offered PMHS and CSCP programs despite multiple offers
Delayed identification of risks posed by increased prisoner numbers and changed laundry access policies
Coroner's recommendations
The Assistant Commissioner, Specialist Operations should ensure that effective systems exist across the state to monitor compliance with court recommended programs and treatment for prisoners
Deputy Commissioners, Custodial Operations, and Community Corrections and Specialist Operations, should remind all staff that all relevant information regarding implementation of court recommendations, attempts to do so, or the rationale for determinations not to provide recommended treatments, should be recorded in IOMS
The General Manager, WFDCC, ensure all windows which provide visibility from WFDCC officer's stations into prisoner accommodation areas should be kept clear of all paper or any other item which may obstruct the view of officers working in those areas
The General Manager, WFDCC, reinforce the expectation that during musters in Secure 2 where only one Custodial Correctional Officer is left to supervise a unit, CCOs prioritise observations of prisoners in the units over the completion of routine administration tasks
The Assistant Commissioner, Central and Northern Region Command give consideration to whether supervision capacity of prisoners residing in accommodation areas at WFDCC can be improved, such as by increasing the number of CCOs rostered to work in those units or by modifying daily routines and task allocation
Implementation of End-to-End case management system with Engagement Plans to capture court-based recommendations
Return laundries to locked status with prisoner access only under direct correctional officer supervision
Conduct statewide review of laundries and kitchenettes to determine additional risk mitigation measures
Ensure all Death in Custody Operational Review Reports are referred to Operational Oversight Committee for tracking of recommendations
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.