Coronial
QLDaged care

Non-inquest findings into the death of MH, an aged care resident

Demographics

98y, female

Coroner

Kirkegaard

Date of death

2022-02-23

Finding date

2024-10-22

Cause of death

Sepsis due to sacral pressure ulcer complicated by osteomyelitis against a background of dementia, frailty, cardiac amyloidosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and Factor V Leiden mutation

AI-generated summary

A 98-year-old woman with dementia and multiple comorbidities died from sepsis secondary to a sacral pressure ulcer that progressed to osteomyelitis while in residential aged care. The coroner identified systemic clinical deficits including inadequate pressure injury risk assessment using validated tools, inappropriate and inconsistently implemented prevention strategies (including use of ineffective donut cushions), poor wound documentation, failure to recognise pain as a cause of behavioural refusal of care, and lack of clinical oversight. The wound deteriorated rapidly from stage 2 to stage 4 with necrosis within days. Critical missed opportunities included failure to escalate deteriorating skin integrity, inadequate wound review frequency given severity, absence of pain assessment and management despite documented severe pain, and insufficient general practitioner involvement during terminal decline. Earlier antibiotic treatment, wound debridement, and consideration of palliation may have altered outcomes.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

geriatric medicinegeneral practiceemergency medicineinfectious diseases

Error types

diagnosticsystemcommunicationdelay

Drugs involved

warfarinmirtazapinefurosemide

Clinical conditions

sacral pressure ulcerosteomyelitissepsisseptic shockdementiabronchiectasisatrial fibrillationtype 2 diabetes mellituschronic kidney diseasefactor v leidencardiac amyloidosiscellulitis

Contributing factors

  • Inadequate pressure injury risk assessment using validated tools
  • Inappropriate pressure injury prevention strategies
  • Use of donut cushion which creates pressure rather than relieves it
  • Inconsistent implementation of repositioning protocols
  • Poor documentation practices in wound assessment and care planning
  • Failure to recognise and respond to rapid deterioration of wound
  • Inadequate wound review frequency given severity
  • Failure to assess and manage wound-related pain
  • Lack of clinical skills and knowledge regarding pressure injury management
  • Inadequate clinical oversight of care implementation
  • Poor communication and coordination between RACF and general practitioner
  • Failure to recognise behavioural changes as indicators of unmet care needs in person with dementia
  • Delayed escalation for medical review
  • Osteomyelitis developing in context of unrelieved pressure and contaminated wound

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implementation of evidence-based pressure injury risk assessment tools such as Braden or Waterlow scales
  2. Enhanced education and training for registered nursing staff regarding pressure injury prevention, staging, and management
  3. Development of comprehensive care planning documentation that specifies frequency of repositioning and other pressure relief strategies
  4. Implementation of consistent wound assessment protocols including regular photography and staging
  5. Assessment and management protocols for wound-related pain in aged care residents
  6. Recognition and response to behavioural changes as potential indicators of unmet care needs in people with dementia
  7. Improved clinical oversight and incident reporting systems for pressure injuries
  8. Enhanced communication and coordination between aged care facilities and general practitioners
  9. Consideration of escalation to higher levels of care when deterioration is observed
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.