Coronial
QLDaged care

Non-inquest findings into the death of Mr H.

Deceased

Mr H

Demographics

89y, male

Coroner

Zerner

Date of death

2022-03-29

Finding date

2025-04-17

Cause of death

combination of biochemical consequences of colonic pseudo-obstruction and faecal loading, on a background of atherosclerotic and cardiovascular disease

AI-generated summary

An 89-year-old man with multiple comorbidities including previous colon cancer died from faecal impaction and stercoral colitis. He resided in a residential aged care facility (RACF) where staff failed to recognize that small bowel movements represented faecal overflow rather than normal bowel function. Despite bowel charts documenting 24 days without significant bowel opening, nursing and medical staff did not escalate care or adequately assess his abdomen after 4 March 2022. He was on opioid analgesia and medications causing constipation, but laxative regimens were inadequate. When he deteriorated acutely with bowel obstruction symptoms, CT imaging revealed severe impaction with stercoral colitis and perforation risk. The coroner found missed opportunities for escalation of constipation management between 4-27 March 2022, poor recognition of faecal overflow patterns, lack of abdominal assessment, and unclear medical escalation pathways contributed to his death.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

geriatric medicinegeneral practiceemergency medicinesurgery

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

macrogolcoloxyl with sennabisacodyl suppositoryopioid analgesiaparacetamolmorphineondansetron

Clinical conditions

faecal impactionstercoral colitiscolonic pseudo-obstructionfaecal overflowconstipationbowel obstructioncolon cancer historydementiacardiovascular diseaseatherosclerosis

Procedures

CT scanenema administration

Contributing factors

  • inadequate bowel care and management in RACF
  • failure to recognize faecal overflow as faecal impaction rather than normal bowel function
  • lack of abdominal assessment after 4 March 2022 despite evidence of faecal loading on 9 March
  • missed opportunities to escalate management of constipation between 4-27 March 2022
  • unclear and undocumented medical escalation pathways between nursing and medical staff
  • inadequate laxative regimen in patient on opioid analgesia
  • shift-by-shift bowel assessment focused on stool type classification, shifting focus away from constipation
  • loss of advance health directive information during transfer
  • lack of central clinical oversight for bowel care
  • poor communication and coordination between visiting GP, geriatrician, and rural hospital physicians

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implement improved bowel management practices in RACFs including new bowel charts and education programs
  2. Ensure nursing staff receive training on how to recognize and appropriately chart stools and bowel movements, distinguishing faecal overflow from normal bowel function
  3. Establish clear, documented medical escalation pathways between nursing and medical officers with specified expectations and availability
  4. Implement regular review of bowel charts by medical officers for unwell patients
  5. Ensure advance health directives and resuscitation plans are visible to all health professionals and appropriately transferred during patient handover
  6. Provide education on medications and medical conditions that contribute to bowel problems, particularly in patients on opioid analgesia
  7. Implement regular abdominal assessment for patients with constipation risk factors
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.