Coronial
QLDhospital

Mrs MDF - Non-inquest findings

Deceased

MDF

Demographics

76y, female

Coroner

McDougall

Date of death

2016-11-30

Finding date

2019-09-05

Cause of death

multisystem organ failure due to or as a consequence of ischaemic small intestine and colon

AI-generated summary

A 76-year-old woman presented to hospital with abdominal pain and was found on CT scan to have ischaemic colitis with signs of profound shock. The Consultant Surgeon decided on conservative management with fluid resuscitation and antibiotics rather than immediate surgery. However, junior medical staff (surgical registrar and ICU registrar) failed to recognize Mrs MDF's clinical deterioration despite progressive metabolic acidosis and haemodynamic instability over several hours. Critically, the Consultant Surgeon and Consultant Intensivist did not directly communicate with each other or personally review the patient. No clear written escalation parameters were established. By the time surgery was undertaken at 7am, the patient was moribund. Expert review identified that a window existed around midnight for surgical intervention that might have offered a chance of survival, but this was missed due to failure to recognize deterioration and absence of proper senior-level coordination and documentation of the management plan.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

surgeryintensive careemergency medicineanaesthesia

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

tramadolmetoclopramidemorphinemethoxyfluranefentanylantibioticsvasopressors

Clinical conditions

ischaemic colitisischaemic bowelmultisystem organ failurehypovolaemic shockmetabolic acidosisacute kidney injury

Procedures

CT scan of abdomenemergency laparotomyintubationcentral venous catheter insertion

Contributing factors

  • failure to recognize clinical deterioration despite metabolic acidosis and haemodynamic instability
  • lack of direct communication between Consultant Surgeon and Consultant Intensivist
  • absence of clear written escalation parameters and management plan
  • junior medical staff (Dr SK and Dr NA) did not appreciate patient's deteriorating condition
  • neither Consultant physically reviewed the patient after initial admission to ICU
  • delay in surgical intervention - patient became moribund before operation
  • lack of contemporaneous medical documentation by senior staff
  • inadequate supervision of junior staff by senior consultants
  • misinterpretation of blood gas results showing marginal lactate reduction despite worsening metabolic acidosis

Coroner's recommendations

  1. All medical officers in the surgical division be reminded of professional standards and expectations of the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, with presentation of de-identified case at departmental meetings for learning
  2. Robina ICU to operate as extension of level 6 ICU at Gold Coast University Hospital
  3. Cross-campus ICU Director with Deputy ICU directors at each site to be appointed
  4. Implementation of written protocols/processes outlining deterioration criteria and escalation triggers for conditions like ischaemic bowel to assist junior staff in knowing when to call senior staff
  5. Requirement for documented Consultant-to-Consultant discussion and clear management plans with specific escalation parameters before admission to ICU for high-risk conditions
  6. Emphasis on importance of senior clinician personal review of complex cases and contemporaneous medical documentation
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.