Coronial
QLDhospital

Mr RR - Non-inquest findings

Demographics

86y, male

Coroner

Kirkegaard

Date of death

2015-07-29

Finding date

2018-04-12

Cause of death

Aspiration Pneumonia secondary to Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma

AI-generated summary

An 86-year-old man died from aspiration pneumonia following bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy. He was admitted to an outlying ward rather than the gastroenterology unit, where nursing staff documented multiple episodes of vomiting overnight. Despite five contacts with Ward Call doctors, bowel preparation continued without escalation to senior staff. Key failures included: no documentation of medical reviews, lack of recognition that continued vomiting indicated intolerance, failure to stop preparation when aspiration risk became apparent, and absence of clinical guidelines for inpatient bowel preparation management. The coroner found that proper escalation to senior medical review earlier, particularly after the first significant vomiting episode, could have led to cessation of preparation and prevention of aspiration. The hospital subsequently implemented a comprehensive bowel preparation guideline with clear escalation criteria.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

gastroenterologycardiologynephrology

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

ondansetronmetoclopramideoxycodonemagnesium citratebisacodylglycoprepamiodaroneheparinpiperacillin-tazobactamdigoxin

Clinical conditions

aspiration pneumoniaatrial fibrillationacute kidney injurycolorectal cancer recurrencenausea and vomiting

Procedures

colonoscopybowel preparation administration

Contributing factors

  • Failure to escalate clinical deterioration to senior medical officer
  • Continuation of bowel preparation despite multiple vomiting episodes
  • Lack of documentation by Ward Call doctors
  • Absence of clinical guidelines for inpatient bowel preparation
  • Patient admitted to outlying ward rather than specialty unit
  • Delay in commencing bowel preparation (6.5 hour delay in Transit Care Hub)
  • Failure to recognise intolerance to bowel preparation
  • Multiple junior doctors providing fragmented care without senior oversight
  • Abnormal vital signs on admission not appropriately acted upon
  • Absence of Rapid Response Team activation despite meeting code criteria

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Review of patient admission process in Transit Care Hub to facilitate inpatient bed admissions for bowel preparation by 3:00pm
  2. Development of clinical guideline for inpatient administration of colonoscopy bowel preparation incorporating escalation processes when administration deviates from expected pathway
  3. Ensure patients requiring inpatient bowel preparation are routinely admitted to the home specialty ward where possible
  4. Escalation of concerns about failure to escalate clinical deterioration with targeted education for junior medical staff on appropriate actions when patients deviate from planned clinical course
  5. Implementation of rapid response criteria alerts in electronic medical records with education for all clinicians on alert recognition and appropriate actions
  6. Emphasis on proper patient selection for colonoscopy with lower threshold for procedure postponement or cancellation in older, fragile patients with abnormal vital signs
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.