Mr C - Non-inquest findings
Deceased
YC
Demographics
87y, male
Date of death
2015-01-10
Finding date
2017-08-29
Cause of death
Endobronchial and pulmonary haemorrhage secondary to pneumonia complicating chronic anthraco-silicotic lung disease
AI-generated summary
An 87-year-old man with atrial fibrillation on warfarin underwent elective bronchoscopy for suspected lung lesion. The admitting respiratory team incorrectly documented a mechanical aortic valve replacement when he actually had a tissue valve; warfarin was for atrial fibrillation, not the valve. This error led to unnecessary bridging anticoagulation with heparin. The patient developed pulmonary haemorrhage, pneumonia, and respiratory failure post-procedure, dying 2 days after bronchoscopy. Autopsy confirmed haemorrhage as the primary cause. The critical lesson is the importance of accurate identification of prosthetic valve type and correct anticoagulation indication from existing records, as incorrect assumptions can introduce life-threatening bleeding risk during perioperative management.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Drugs involved
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- Incorrect assumption regarding type of aortic valve replacement (mechanical vs tissue)
- Failure to review existing medical records documenting valve type and indication for warfarin
- Unnecessary bridging anticoagulation with heparin due to misidentification of valve type
- Friable mucosa biopsied during procedure
- Pneumonia complicating anthraco-silicotic lung disease
- Patient history transcription error in admission notes
Coroner's recommendations
- Implementation of integrated Electronic Medical Records (iEMR) with a common Problem List shared by all clinicians to ensure continuity of understanding of cardiac valve type across treating teams
- Use of updated Respiratory Procedure Booking Form with specific documentation of anticoagulation planning and requirements
- Enhanced clinician education regarding the distinction between mechanical and bioprosthetic valve replacement and associated anticoagulation indications
- Standardised processes to ensure review of previous medical records and imaging when patients are readmitted, particularly for procedural planning
- Risk assessment protocols for determining appropriateness of bridging anticoagulation based on current clinical guidelines rather than assumptions
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —