Coronial
QLDhospital

Inquest into the death of Shirley Elizabeth Haggett

Deceased

Shirley Elizabeth Haggett

Demographics

78y, female

Date of death

2019-05-22

Finding date

2025-10-23

Cause of death

Tension pneumothorax (surgically managed) due to aspiration pneumonia (bronchoscopy) due to facial melanoma excision under high-flow nasal oxygen and sedation

AI-generated summary

78-year-old woman with severe COPD and type 2 respiratory failure underwent elective melanoma surgery at a private day hospital (North Lakes Day Hospital) despite being classified as ASA 4 (unsuitable for day surgery). The hospital was licensed only for ASA 1-3 patients. The anaesthetist administered high-flow, high-concentration oxygen for over 2 hours, which in a CO2 retainer caused severe hypercarbia and hypercarbic narcosis. Post-operatively, the patient remained obtunded. Despite concerning vital signs (respiratory rate >30, low oxygen saturations), the anaesthetist did not arrange immediate ICU transfer, instead planning to monitor for another hour. The patient aspirated before transfer could be arranged. She deteriorated despite ICU admission and multi-organ failure developed. Key failures: (1) admission of ASA 4 patient to inappropriate facility; (2) inadequate pre-operative assessment of respiratory status; (3) use of high-flow oxygen in CO2 retainer; (4) failure to recognise deterioration post-operatively and arrange timely ICU transfer; (5) systemic failures in escalation protocols at the day hospital.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.

Contributing factors

  • ASA 4 patient admitted to day surgery facility licensed only for ASA 1-3
  • Inadequate pre-operative assessment of respiratory function
  • High-flow, high-concentration oxygen administration in CO2 retainer for >2 hours causing hypercarbia and hypercarbic narcosis
  • Failure to recognise post-operative deterioration despite concerning vital signs
  • Delay in transfer to ICU
  • Aspiration event
  • Anaesthetist fixation error and inappropriate post-operative plan
  • Systemic failures in escalation and communication at day hospital
  • Inadequate monitoring capabilities in recovery unit for complex patient

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Systems improvements at day hospitals to prevent admission of patients beyond licensing scope, including automated checks and clear communication of licence limitations to all visiting medical officers
  2. Pre-operative anaesthetic assessment should occur prior to day of surgery for complex/high-risk patients
  3. Anaesthetists should conduct thorough pre-operative history including specific inquiry about home oxygen use and CO2 retention status
  4. Protocols for early escalation and MET call criteria should be clear and readily accessible
  5. Equipment suitable for managing complex patients should be available at day surgery facilities admitting such patients
  6. Post-operative observation periods should be adequate with clear management plans documented
  7. Nursing staff should be empowered to escalate concerns and arrange transfer without undue administrative barriers
  8. Training should address recognition of CO2 retention risk and appropriate oxygen delivery methods
  9. Day surgery facilities should have clear pathways for arranging ICU transfers
  10. Clinical leadership should be actively involved in oversight of patient care and escalation decisions
Full text

Related cases

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —