Pulmonary embolism originating from deep vein thrombosis in right calf
AI-generated summary
A 32-year-old man died from pulmonary embolism six days after emergency appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. VTE prophylaxis was appropriately prescribed. However, the clinical team failed to investigate persistent hypoxia (low oxygen saturations 78-85%) from post-operative day 3 onwards. Critical failures included: incorrect completion of early warning scores (Q-ADDS) with missed escalation triggers; oxygen administration without medical prescription or investigation of underlying cause; inadequate recognition that an otherwise healthy young patient requiring continuous supplemental oxygen for six days was abnormal; fractured clinical handover processes; and absence of documented VTE risk reassessment post-operatively despite reduced mobility. An arterial blood gas was never performed despite persistent hypoxia. Earlier investigation of oxygen desaturation could have raised suspicion for pulmonary embolism and prompted therapeutic anticoagulation rather than prophylactic doses, potentially changing outcome.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
general surgeryanaesthesiaorthopaedic surgeryphysiotherapy
Error types
diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay
Drugs involved
heparinparacetamol
Clinical conditions
pulmonary embolismdeep vein thrombosisruptured appendicitisacute appendicitis with perforationperitonitispost-operative ileusatelectasishypoxiavenous thromboembolism
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.