Coronial
QLDhospital

Platt, Christopher Robert Edmund - Non-inquest findings

Deceased

Christopher Robert Edmund Platt

Demographics

69y, male

Coroner

Lock

Date of death

2010-04-16

Finding date

2014-03-31

Cause of death

Perforated bowel/septicaemia as a result of diverticulitis

AI-generated summary

A 69-year-old man presented to the ED with abdominal distension, incontinence and dehydration but was discharged with a diagnosis of depression and constipation. He returned 2 days later critically unwell and died of perforated bowel and septicaemia secondary to diverticulitis. Critical failures included: missing early signs of serious intra-abdominal pathology (elevated WCC, x-ray findings suggestive of small bowel obstruction, low albumin, tachypnoea, low oxygen saturations); inappropriate enema administration which may have been harmful; delayed x-ray reporting; poor clinical handover and documentation; and failure of the senior clinician to recognise red flags. The independent expert concluded the patient should have been admitted on first presentation. Improvements since include better ED staffing, communication, and early screening. Key lessons: formal clinical handover procedures and improved documentation standards are essential.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicinegeneral surgerypsychiatryradiologygeneral medicineoccupational therapy

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

sodium citrate enemaparacetamoldiazepamthiamine

Clinical conditions

diverticulitissmall bowel obstructionischaemic bowelsepticaemiaperitonitisdepressionalcohol abusedehydrationatrial fibrillationmesenteric ischaemia

Procedures

enema administrationblood culturex-ray imagingCT imaging

Contributing factors

  • Failure to recognise early signs of serious intra-abdominal pathology on first presentation (elevated WCC, x-ray findings, low albumin, tachypnoea, low oxygen saturations)
  • Misdiagnosis of constipation with overflow incontinence when presentation was consistent with diverticulitis/ischaemic bowel
  • Administration of enemas which may have been harmful in context of possible ischaemic bowel or diverticulitis
  • Delayed x-ray reporting (not reported until next day)
  • Inadequate assessment of cause of immobility and clinical deterioration
  • Poor clinical handover between multiple staff members
  • Inadequate documentation of clinical assessments and discussions
  • Failure of senior clinician (Dr B.) to recognise red flags and high-risk patient
  • Failure to act on elevated white cell count in context of other findings
  • Insufficient investigation prior to discharge despite signs of serious illness
  • Family concerns about discharge not adequately addressed or documented
  • Lack of formal consultation requirement with ED consultant prior to discharge at that time

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Completion of work around Clinical Handover for West Moreton Hospital and Health Service with implementation of formal procedure and auditing program based on National Standards incorporating both verbal and written handover
  2. Review and update the Clinical Documentation procedure (DWMProc201000580) with all staff made aware upon publication
  3. Conduct random chart audit to identify documentation deficiencies with audit report to identify remedial actions and be tabled at Hospital and Health Service Executive Safety and Quality Meeting
  4. Implementation of Adult Deterioration Detection System (ADDS) throughout the Health Service for early identification and response to patient deterioration
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.