Coronial
QLDprison

Lingwood, Craig Steven

Deceased

Craig Steven Lingwood

Demographics

45y, male

Coroner

Ryan

Date of death

2011-05-10

Finding date

2014-01-24

Cause of death

metastatic malignant melanoma

AI-generated summary

Craig Lingwood, a 45-year-old prisoner, died from metastatic melanoma in May 2011. He first complained of a suspicious mole (red, itchy, bleeding) in 2005-2006, but the prison doctor (Dr Cave) assessed it as benign in August and December 2006 without performing biopsy. In February 2008, hospital dermatologist Dr Ewart identified it as probable melanoma and made an urgent referral to the Lesion Clinic, but this referral was lost in the system and never acted upon by the prison. When Lingwood finally saw a new prison doctor (Dr Christie) in September 2008, biopsy confirmed melanoma. Excision occurred in October 2008—over two years after initial presentation. Critical failures included: inadequate tracking of urgent referrals from hospital to prison; failure to follow up the referral through hospital systems; lack of structured follow-up protocols post-excision (should have been 3-4 monthly reviews per guidelines); and no system to identify when referrals fell through cracks. Earlier intervention in 2006-2008 may have improved prognosis. Systemic deficiencies rather than individual clinician fault contributed to delays.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

dermatologygeneral practicecorrectional healthoncologypalliative care

Error types

diagnosticsystemdelaycommunication

Clinical conditions

melanomanodular melanomametastatic melanomaStage IIa melanoma

Procedures

punch biopsywide excision of melanomasurgery for femur metastasis

Contributing factors

  • initial mischaracterisation of lesion as benign by prison doctor in 2006
  • failure to perform biopsy on suspicious lesion despite clinical indicators
  • loss of urgent referral from hospital dermatologist to Lesion Clinic (February 2008)
  • lack of formal system in prison for tracking and following up referrals to external providers
  • hospital failure to follow up or verify that referred patient received appointment
  • delay of approximately 2 years between initial presentation and definitive excision
  • absence of structured follow-up plan post-excision despite Stage IIa disease
  • no regular surveillance between July 2009 and July 2010
  • late detection of metastatic recurrence (July 2010)
  • inadequate policies and procedures for prisoner referral management

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implement formal policies and procedures for monitoring and tracking medical referrals of prisoners to external service providers (subsequently implemented by CQHHS in September 2013)
  2. Ensure full skin examinations are conducted routinely upon prison reception for all prisoners (subsequently implemented in March 2011)
  3. Establish systems to formalise the Medical Request Form process and ensure appropriate urgency is assigned (formalised in July 2011, revised 2012)
  4. Implement photography protocols for mole/skin condition monitoring (introduced July 2010)
  5. Establish structured follow-up and review plans when prisoners are discharged from hospital after treatment for serious conditions such as melanoma
  6. Enable electronic access to Queensland Health IT clinical systems (HBCIS) at correctional facilities to allow verification of referral status and appointments
  7. Develop collaborative processes between prison health services and hospital outpatient departments to ensure urgent referrals are actioned and tracked
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.