Coronial
QLDaged care

Anderson, Stanley Charles

Deceased

Stanley Charles Anderson

Demographics

86y, male

Coroner

Baldwin

Date of death

2009-04-12

Finding date

2012-10-19

Cause of death

coronary and cerebral atherosclerosis with significant conditions of fractured leg bones following the fall as well as bronchitis

AI-generated summary

Mr. Stanley Charles Anderson, aged 86, died at Gympie General Hospital from coronary and cerebral atherosclerosis, precipitated by injuries sustained in a fall at a nursing home. While transferring from a bath trolley to a comfort chair using a mechanical hoist and sling, he became unstable and fell legs-first onto the floor, fracturing both legs and his left hip. The coroner identified several preventable system failures: the sling selection process lacked professional (physiotherapy/occupational therapy) oversight; staff training on sling configuration options was inadequate; there were no clear guidelines for adjusting sling straps or determining which configuration should be used for individual residents; and there was no systematic review of sling fit as patients became increasingly frail and lost weight. The coroner recommended establishing professional input into sling selection and adjustment, reviewing training programs to emphasize configuration selection based on patient factors (catheter use, skin integrity, rigidity), and implementing systems to track near-misses and communicate with manufacturers.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

geriatric medicineoccupational and environmental healthpathologyorthopaedic surgery

Error types

systemcommunication

Clinical conditions

coronary atherosclerosiscerebral atherosclerosisfrailtyrigidityskin integrity issuesfracture of left femurfracture of right tibiafracture of left tibia and fibulafracture of left hip

Procedures

mechanical hoist transfersling-assisted patient transfer

Contributing factors

  • incorrect sling configuration used for patient with catheter
  • lack of professional (physiotherapy/occupational therapy) input into sling selection
  • inadequate training on sling adjustment and configuration options
  • no guidelines for determining appropriate sling configuration based on patient factors
  • no systematic review of sling fit as patient became frailer and lost weight
  • patient instability in hammock-style sling during transfer
  • lack of clear protocols for near-miss reporting and manufacturer feedback

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Review and strengthen the training program for use of hoists and slings, with particular emphasis on how incidents such as this can occur
  2. Establish clear guidelines on how straps should be adjusted to maximize patient stability, rather than the informal approach of 'we just talk about it'
  3. Develop clear guidelines specifying which sling configuration should be used in different patient situations, particularly considering factors such as catheter use, skin integrity, and patient rigidity
  4. Ensure professional (physiotherapy or occupational therapy) input is involved in the selection of slings for each patient, rather than selection by unqualified health assistants
  5. Implement a system to regularly review sling fit as patients' health deteriorates and weight decreases
  6. Establish a system to review incidents and near-misses, and liaise with sling manufacturers regarding possible design improvements
  7. Ensure all staff understand the importance of reporting near-misses to enable risk management and manufacturer feedback
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.