Inquest into the death of Road Death 35 of 2024
Demographics
20y, female
Date of death
2024-07-22
Finding date
2024
Cause of death
Severe traumatic brain injury sustained in a pedestrian versus motor vehicle collision
AI-generated summary
A 20-year-old Aboriginal female pedestrian with bilateral hearing loss was struck by a vehicle driven by an intoxicated male driver (BAC 0.158%) travelling at 74 kph in a 60 kph zone. She suffered catastrophic traumatic brain injury and was declared brain dead four days later. Two other drivers successfully avoided her on the roadway. The coroner identified multiple contributing factors: driver intoxication and speeding were primary; the pedestrian's hearing loss, headphone use, and position on the roadway contributed. This tragedy illustrates the compounding dangers of impaired driving, excessive speed, and reduced pedestrian awareness. The case highlights the critical importance of road safety education, drink-driving prevention, and awareness of disability-related vulnerabilities in road environments.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Contributing factors
- Driver intoxication (BAC 0.158%, more than three times legal limit)
- Driver speeding (74 kph in 60 kph zone)
- Pedestrian bilateral hearing loss
- Pedestrian wearing headphones reducing environmental awareness
- Pedestrian position on roadway
- Inadequate pedestrian response to approaching vehicle
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —