Coronial
NThospital

Inquest into the death of T. Ptjara and T. Ptjara

Deceased

Ted Ptjara (Little Brother) and Tim Ptjara (Big Brother)

Demographics

male

Date of death

2023-07-19 and 2023-09-12

Finding date

2025-12-19

Cause of death

Little Brother: multi-organ dysfunction due to hypothermia with contributing conditions of urinary tract infection, pneumonia, ischaemic heart disease, diabetes and hypertension. Big Brother: organising pneumonia and coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (ischaemic heart disease) with contributing conditions of type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

AI-generated summary

Two Aboriginal brothers with chronic alcohol use disorder and cognitive impairment died in July and September 2023 in Alice Springs Hospital. Both had adult guardianship orders, NDIS packages, and aged care assessments recommending residential placement, yet remained homeless throughout. Little Brother died from hypothermia after leaving hospital inadequately dressed; Big Brother died from pneumonia and ischaemic heart disease while in custody, having been subjected to spit hoods during hospitalisation. Critical failures included: inadequate use of interpreters when discussing accommodation (both men were limited English speakers), leading to misunderstanding of offered services; no formal decision-making process addressing homelessness despite its profound health impacts; service gaps in medication management, aftercare for alcohol withdrawal, and residential facilities for people with cognitive impairment; and unjustified use of spit hoods on a vulnerable, cognitively impaired patient. The coroner found systemic failures in communication, advocacy, and culturally appropriate care, with recommendations for improved guardianship processes, police cultural competency, and abolition of spit hood use.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

emergency medicineintensive caregeriatric medicineaddiction medicinepsychiatrycorrectional healthpalliative care

Error types

communicationsystemdelay

Clinical conditions

chronic alcohol use disorderWernicke-Korsakoff syndromehypothermiapneumoniaischaemic heart diseasediabetes mellitushypertensionurinary tract infectionorganising pneumoniacerebral and cerebellar atrophycognitive impairment

Contributing factors

  • chronic homelessness
  • chronic alcohol use disorder
  • Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome and cognitive impairment
  • inadequate use of interpreters in communication
  • failure to undertake meaningful decision-making regarding accommodation options
  • service gaps in medication management and alcohol withdrawal care
  • lack of culturally appropriate services
  • exposure to cold without adequate protection after taking own leave
  • use of spit hood in hospital setting
  • incarceration of person unfit for custody and requiring residential care
  • poor coordination between Office of Public Guardian and NDIS support services

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Office of the Public Guardian implement an alert system to review, act and/or make decisions concerning homeless clients every three months of continued homelessness
  2. Office of the Public Guardian review whether its current approach to case management and proactive advocacy for individual clients meets its obligations under s 21 of the Guardianship of Adults Act
  3. Office of the Public Guardian commence annual reviews of clients and a process for prioritising these reviews
  4. Office of the Public Guardian develop a strategy to improve culturally appropriate practices to meet the needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people under Adult Guardianship orders
  5. NT Police undertake a review including by the Cultural Reform Command of policy, procedure and training concerning visual identification of deceased and communication with Aboriginal families in the coronial process to determine whether improvements based in cultural competency can be implemented
  6. Department of Corrections undertake a thorough inquiry to examine the nature and likelihood of any risk to staff from spitting, the nature and likelihood of any risk to prisoners from spit hood application and the suitability of alternatives to spit hoods, with findings well documented; use of spit hoods should be prohibited except if empirical evidence justifies continued use
  7. If spit hoods continue to be available, Department of Corrections update training, policies and procedures to ensure staff are: fully informed on extent and nature of disease transmission risk based on expert evidence; fully informed on potential for physical and psychological harm to prisoners from spit hood use; fully informed concerning health risks of prisoners that are contraindicators for use; trained on alternative means to managing spitting incidents without spit hoods including donning PPE; trained to seek medical practitioners' advice before use; trained that spit hood use is a last resort; trained on requirement for swift removal if hoods used (maximum 5 minutes)
  8. If spit hoods continue to be available, Department of Corrections ensure personal protective equipment is included in any kit containing a spit hood and require Corrections officers to immediately don PPE and remove hood within 5 minutes if used
  9. If spit hoods continue to be available, Department of Corrections ensure every use is thoroughly reviewed by Deputy Commissioner or delegate to ensure all policy and procedure correctly applied and action taken on any breach
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.