Inquest into the death of Daniel Alexander Bleaney
Deceased
Daniel Alexander Bleaney
Demographics
37y, male
Date of death
2017-10-19
Finding date
2019-09-13
Cause of death
blunt force injuries to the head and chest from jumping off an 8.65 metre roof
AI-generated summary
Daniel Bleaney, 37, experienced acute psychosis with command hallucinations while at sea and attempted suicide by jumping overboard. He was rescued and admitted involuntarily to Cowdy Ward, an open psychiatric ward, following assessment in the ED. He was assessed as highest risk for suicide but placed on 15-minute observations rather than one-to-one nursing care. Despite staff awareness that patients could abscond over the courtyard fence (with a prior 2015 death from the same ward), adequate security measures were not implemented. Approximately 10 hours after admission, Daniel left the ward through the courtyard, ran across hospital grounds, climbed onto a building roof, and jumped to his death. The coroner found his death entirely preventable, citing failure to maintain a secure environment, inadequate supervision despite high suicide risk, and institutional failure to apply lessons from a prior similar death.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
acute psychosis with command hallucinations instructing suicide
recent serious suicide attempt (jumped from ship)
admitted to open (non-secure) psychiatric ward despite high suicide risk
inadequate level of nursing supervision (15-minute observations vs. one-to-one)
ward courtyard fence known to be scalable by athletic patients
lack of implementation of security improvements after prior 2015 death
staff misperception that Cowdy Ward was secure
patient appeared compliant and well-mannered, masking serious ongoing suicidal intent
failure to keep alive institutional memory of prior death from same ward
lack of staff induction on known risks
communication failures with family regarding ward security status
Coroner's recommendations
That Top End Health Service ensure such alterations are made to the courtyard in Cowdy Ward so as to prevent absconding over the fence
That induction and training of all staff include an appropriate description of the security status of Cowdy Ward and appropriate mitigation strategies to mitigate the known risks
That TEMHS take all appropriate steps to ensure that Cowdy Ward is a physically secure ward, including the construction of a courtyard fence that is fit for purpose while not detracting from the therapeutic environment
That TEMHS review the way that it assesses patients, including their risk of suicide, and educates staff on risk assessment and appropriate steps following risk assessment
That TEMHS review its guidelines around the use of one-to-one observation ('specials') for patients in Cowdy Ward and educate staff on availability, need and requirements
That TEMHS implement a policy in relation to the conduct of 15-minute observations, including information to be noted, relationship to risk assessment, and accountability for proper conduct
That the psychiatric consultant and/or registrars responsible for patient care each day perform a ward round before leaving for outpatients or attend the morning handover meeting
That TEMHS cease using the term 'take own leave' in relation to involuntary patients and replace with 'abscond' or 'AWOL'
That TEMHS conduct review and further training for all staff in relation to appropriate, responsive and timely steps in event of patient absconding, including rapid search protocols and notifications
That TEMHS implement a policy or protocol around meeting with families of deceased patients, including necessary information to be obtained before a meeting to ensure it is useful and minimises further distress
That the above policies, procedures and protocols are regularly reviewed, updated, kept contemporaneous and available to all staff, and are available during staff orientation
That TEMHS audit and monitor the progress of key findings and recommendations in a meaningful way to ensure gaps in improvements are not lost
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.