Coronial
NThospital

Inquest into the death of Margaret Winter

Deceased

Margaret Sisko Winter

Demographics

64y, female

Date of death

2006-12-16

Finding date

2008-09-04

Cause of death

acute subdural haemorrhage sustained after a fall on Ward 4A

AI-generated summary

Margaret Winter, 64, died from acute subdural haemorrhage following a fall on Ward 4A on 13 December 2006. She had been admitted with decompensated liver disease. Her falls risk was misclassified as low when it should have been medium, and appropriate fall prevention strategies were not implemented. Critically, half-hourly neurological observations prescribed after the fall were not performed for almost 2 hours before she was found unconscious. The coroner found her death may well have been preventable. Nursing staffing deficiencies were identified as the primary contributing factor: too few nurses, too many agency and overtime staff, and poor skills mix. The coroner found systemic failures including departmental policies that restricted recruitment, set staffing based on budget rather than evidence-based methodology, and created barriers to requesting additional staff. The coroner emphasised the need for evidence-based staffing models and improved quality and safety processes.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

general medicineneurologyintensive caresurgery

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystem

Clinical conditions

chronic liver diseaseprimary biliary cirrhosisdecompensated liver failurecoagulopathypostural hypotensionsubdural haemorrhage

Procedures

liver biopsyintubationCT scanemergency surgery for subdural haematoma evacuation

Contributing factors

  • misclassification of falls risk as low rather than medium
  • failure to implement appropriate fall prevention strategies
  • failure to perform half-hourly neurological observations as prescribed
  • significant nursing staffing deficiency
  • too few nurses for patient numbers and acuity
  • excessive use of agency and overtime staff
  • poor nursing skills mix with too many enrolled nurses relative to registered nurses
  • nursing staff from different areas unfamiliar with the ward
  • barriers to requesting additional staff for shifts
  • withdrawal of recruitment delegations in early 2006
  • staffing numbers set below evidence-based requirements
  • lack of evidence-based methodology for determining staffing levels

Coroner's recommendations

  1. An appropriate nursing staffing methodology should be implemented which gives consideration to casemix, acuity and patient turnover. The use of staff working double shifts, agency or pool staff should only occur under exceptional circumstances (such as sick leave, increased acuity, specialling and increased bed numbers) rather than being used routinely to fill shifts in a roster.
  2. If additional staff are needed (PCAs, nurse specials, extra nurses for overflow beds) then the Nursing Resource Coordinator should have delegated authority to make this decision. This delegation should be documented in a policy document that is widely available. Reasons for the request, and reasons for any refusal, must be provided and documented so decisions are transparent.
  3. Nursing staff should be required to complete either the Observation Special or the Neurological Observation Chart but not both.
  4. The quality and safety processes need to be dramatically improved. Senior staff with appropriate authority need to be given the power to conduct reviews and making recommendations, if appropriate, in relation to sentinel events, and there needs to be a commitment at the highest levels to using the reviews to improve practice.
  5. There should be an audit of the current compliance with the falls policy and, if it demonstrates a lack of compliance, steps should be taken to ensure the policy is complied with.
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.