Cardiac and respiratory arrest probably connected with embolic stroke
AI-generated summary
A 5-year-old Aboriginal child with complex congenital heart disease (DORV with asplenia and situs inversus) died of cardiac arrest from embolic stroke. She had undergone initial BT shunt surgery but required a Glenn shunt, clearly indicated after cardiac catheterization in 2006-2007. Critical failures in care coordination led to her death: loss to follow-up for extended periods due to poor communication between cardiologist and surgeon; no written surgical plans or formal referrals; no backup appointment system; failure to monitor and escalate clinical deterioration (low oxygen saturation, functional decline reported by Karitane); no formal surgical waiting list. She waited at least 8 months for surgery after angiography in April 2009, then died in December 2009 before the operation. The coroner recommended formalizing surgical prioritization, implementing documented care plans with written inter-specialist communication, establishing backup appointments, and maintaining surgical waiting lists.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Loss of follow-up due to poor coordination between cardiologist and surgeon
Absence of written surgical plan or formal referral
No backup appointment system for surgical follow-up
Failure to monitor and report clinical deterioration to surgeon
Lack of formal surgical waiting list
Inadequate documentation and communication between specialists
Cardiologist ceased reviews after referring to surgeon
Surgeon assumed responsibility remained with cardiologist without explicit handover
Coroner's recommendations
A policy to ensure that all decisions concerning surgical and parasurgical procedures made during joint surgical review meetings are properly documented, included in the medical records of each patient the subject of discussion at such meetings and promptly communicated in writing to any relevant clinician missing from the meeting
A policy to ensure that should a treating clinician decide in a particular case to depart from a decision of the meeting, such change or changes be promptly communicated in writing to the Head of the Heart Centre or the Head of Cardiothoracic Surgery within the Heart Centre and a copy inserted in the patient's medical records
A policy to ensure that a referral by a cardiologist to a surgeon be accompanied, at the time the referral is made, by a letter of referral sent to the relevant surgeon with a copy to be placed in the medical records of the patient
A policy to ensure that a back up appointment for review by the treating cardiologist is made and documented whenever a cardiologist refers a patient to a surgeon or other clinician for surgical or parasurgical treatment
A policy to ensure that a referral by a cardiologist to a surgeon or other clinician for surgical or parasurgical treatment be accompanied by advice that the patient re-present to the cardiologist within a prescribed period, but not more than 6 months, in the event that such treatment does not occur within that time
A policy to ensure that the Head of Cardiothoracic Surgery within the Heart Centre compile and maintain a surgical waiting list or lists detailing all patients for whom surgery is planned or contemplated within 12 months
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —