Inquest into the death of Heather Winchester
Deceased
Heather Winchester
Demographics
75y, female
Date of death
2019-09-27
Finding date
2025-02-28
Cause of death
multiple organ failure due to severe anaemia secondary to blood loss post elective hysterectomy surgery, with contributing factors being ischaemic heart disease, chronic kidney injury, and diabetes
AI-generated summary
A 75-year-old woman died from multiple organ failure due to severe anaemia after elective hysterectomy surgery. Critical failures occurred: the surgical and anaesthetic teams held conflicting understandings about whether she would accept blood transfusion—the surgeon believed she refused all blood products based on her consent form and Jehovah's Witness faith, while the anaesthetist believed she accepted packed red blood cells based on worksheets presented during pre-operative assessment. These differing understandings were not identified before surgery or during the timeout procedure. When massive post-operative bleeding occurred, the patient ultimately refused transfusion and died. Clinicians should ensure all team members review pre-anaesthetic clinic notes before surgery, clarify blood product refusal through structured procedures, implement robust timeout protocols to identify inconsistencies, and recognise that religious documents may be confusing and require explicit clinical discussion.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Error types
Clinical conditions
Contributing factors
- differing understandings between surgical and anaesthetic teams regarding blood product acceptance
- failure to review consent form during pre-operative assessment
- inadequate risk counselling regarding patient comorbidities
- failure to identify inconsistencies during timeout procedure
- confusing religious documentation (Worksheets 1 and 2)
- poor coordination between surgical and anaesthetic teams
- uncertainty regarding aspirin use
- inadequate systems for identifying treatment refusals
Coroner's recommendations
- Hunter New England Local Health District must put in place a requirement that a member of the surgical team review the pre-anaesthetic clinic notes prior to surgery
- Review the timeout procedure in the Clinical Procedure Safety policy to identify anomalies such as blood screening conducted for patients who have refused transfusion
- Implement a procedure followed by all relevant medical staff when a patient identifies as a Jehovah's Witness, including: advising of Jehovah's Witness Hospital Liaison Committee availability; providing an appropriate form for partial refusal of blood products; providing a checklist of available blood products; listing all documentation to be sought from the patient
- The Chief Executive at Hunter New England Local Health District take steps to resume regular meetings between the church's Hospital Liaison Committee and Directors of Medical Services at each hospital to enhance understanding of Jehovah's Witness treatment preferences and available resources
- Training and education provided to visiting medical officers and locums be reviewed to ensure they understand how to access all relevant electronic records and their responsibility to do so
- All New South Wales congregants of Jehovah's Witnesses be advised that Worksheets 1 and 2 are no longer to be relied upon and should not be used for any purpose; this advice should be conveyed through all available resources
- The church advise congregants in New South Wales of the precise status of development of products from human or animal haemoglobin for treating acute anaemia or massive blood loss; advice should be relayed through all available resources
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —