Dima Thomson, a 39-year-old man with a history of alcohol-fuelled domestic violence incidents and mental health conditions, died from multiple gunshot wounds after police attended his home responding to a breach of an apprehended domestic violence order (ADVO). While police appropriately gathered background information and investigated the alleged breach, several procedural gaps were identified: no contact was made with the attending supervisor as required, no formal arrest plan was devised despite adequate time and opportunity to do so, and no explicit enquiry was made about weapons despite Dima's violent history and a mother's earlier observation of him holding a knife. When police informed Dima of his arrest and attempted to handcuff him, he unexpectedly produced a folding knife and advanced toward officers. The discharge of firearms by two constables was found to be reasonable and lawful. The coroner emphasised that while planning the arrest might not have changed the outcome, it represented an important learning point for the NSWPF regarding the necessity to plan more complex arrests, particularly involving intoxicated individuals with violent histories.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
forensic medicine
Error types
communicationsystemdelay
Drugs involved
alcoholdiazepamnordiazepamtemazepamoxazepam
Clinical conditions
attention deficit hyperactivity disorderanxietydepressionalcohol intoxicationdomestic violence perpetrationself-harm history
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.