B W, aged 31, died by hanging following emergency police removal of his daughter from his care under the Care and Protection Act. The removal occurred in early hours of 17 April 2020 during COVID-19 lockdown. B W had long-standing depression, anxiety, and alcohol misuse, was under financial and parenting stress, and had made previous suicide threats. Police officers conducting the removal observed him distressed and intoxicated but did not assess his mental health or consider welfare supports. No officer considered the serious suicide risk posed by separating him from his daughter. Delayed DCJ response and inadequate coordination between agencies meant B W had no contact with casework support before his death. Officers lacked training in handling emergency removals with attention to parental welfare. Key learning: police and DCJ require formal collaboration, improved guidance on recognising mental health crisis in removal contexts, and protocols for supporting distressed parents during child removals.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
inadequate interagency communication between NSW Police and DCJ
delayed DCJ case allocation and home visit
COVID-19 pandemic impact on support services and agency capacity
parental distress following child removal
absence of immediate casework support following removal
police lack of training in parental welfare during emergency removals
junior officer deference to hierarchy preventing escalation of suicide threat information
Coroner's recommendations
Office of the Senior Practitioner give consideration to what further policy guidance and practical assistance the Department can provide to NSW Police in respect of conduct of removals of children pursuant to s 43 Care Act
NSW Police notify DCJ as soon as reasonably practicable of any determination to exercise police power to remove a child, with priority access to DCJ Child Protection Helpline
NSW Police Force Handbook and Operations Manual be reviewed to enhance police knowledge on conduct of emergency removals, including content on separation and loss, support during removal, helping children make sense of removal, and assuming care of child
NSW Police review publications and training resources on emergency removals, having regard to DCJ Removal or Assumption of a Child Mandate and Separation and Loss Practice Advice
NSW Police consider delivery of training sessions to appropriate class of officers, including by online means, on conduct of decisions to remove children pursuant to s 43 Care Act
NSW Police Commissioner review Prioritising Police Response to Incidents policy and guidance material to ensure consistency with amended Radio Operations Group Standard Operating Procedure requiring all incidents involving threat of self-harm be assigned Priority 2 response
NSW Police Academy education and training prior to attestation be reviewed to ensure adequate instruction on importance of junior officers raising relevant information directly with supervisors
Joint creation by NSW Police and DCJ of fact sheet required to be given to parent at time of emergency child removal, including why removal occurred, what happens next, DCJ Helpline details, police officer contact details, Legal Aid NSW contact, complaint procedures, and 24/7 mental health support services
Interagency Guidelines on Reporting and Responding to Child Wellbeing and Safety Concerns be jointly reviewed to include reference to police exercise of power under s 43 Care Act with hyperlinks to relevant NSWPF policies
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —