A 44-year-old man died by hanging in a prison cell two days after reception. Despite disclosing a history of depression and recent heavy methamphetamine use, he was not prescribed his usual escitalopram medication, was placed in a cell with numerous hanging points despite being unmedicated and unassessed by psychiatry, and was left alone when his cellmate was transferred for medical treatment. The coroner found that placement in a two-person cell until psychiatric assessment, prompt medication reinstatement, and architectural modifications to eliminate hanging points could potentially have prevented this death. Key issues included inadequate initial health screening regarding drug withdrawal effects, delayed mental health assessment, and unsafe cell design.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Brief and superficial initial health screening with low Kessler-10 score failing to capture clinical risk
Cellmate's departure leaving prisoner alone in unsafe environment
Coroner's recommendations
MTC-Broadspectrum should alert its health provider SVHS to consider reviewing induction nursing training regarding the potential mental and mood effects of ceasing amphetamines after heavy use, particularly in inmates with known depression history
Formal protocols should be considered to mitigate risk of placing prisoners with documented mental health histories alone in cells known to provide hanging points prior to full mental health assessment
Placement of at-risk prisoners in two-out cells should be considered until mental health assessment and medication review is completed
Support the recommendation from Magistrate Elizabeth Ryan's inquest into death of L regarding exploration of tear-resistant sheets for inmates in normal cell placement
Government commitment and budgetary support is needed to implement comprehensive cell design solutions to eliminate hanging points across the correctional estate, as identified in the Perumal Pedavoli Architects review
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —