Coronial
NSWmental health

Inquest into the death of MA

Deceased

MA

Demographics

28y, male

Coroner

Decision ofActing State Coroner O'Sullivan

Date of death

2014-02-28

Finding date

2018-02-02

Cause of death

Neck compression consistent with hanging

AI-generated summary

A 28-year-old man with severe depression, persistent suicidal ideation and previous suicide attempts died by hanging in a mental health inpatient unit while under involuntary detention. Despite being assessed as high suicide risk and assigned Level 2 (15-minute) observations, care was allocated to an unsupervised trainee enrolled nurse. Systematic failures included: routine falsification of observation records ('phantom entries'), inadequate nurse staffing mix, absence of supervision for trainee staff, lack of formal training in observation procedures, no auditing program, and poor communication between medical and nursing staff about observation levels and rationale for changes. Medical care was appropriate, but nursing practice was non-compliant with policies. The death was preventable through proper implementation of observation protocols, appropriate staffing, supervision of trainees, and formal auditing systems.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

psychiatry

Error types

systemcommunicationproceduralsupervision_issue

Drugs involved

venlafaxinevenlafaxinequetiapineolanzapinelithium carbonate

Clinical conditions

severe depressionpersistent suicidal ideationsomatic delusiontreatment-resistant depression

Contributing factors

  • Routine non-compliance with patient observation protocols
  • Falsification of observation records - 'phantom entries' where observations recorded without being performed
  • Inappropriate staffing mix - trainee nurse without supervision assigned high-risk patient
  • Absence of formal training in observation procedures for nursing staff
  • Lack of auditing program to detect non-compliance
  • Inadequate supervision of trainee enrolled nurse
  • Poor communication between medical and nursing staff regarding risk assessment and observation levels
  • Absence of documented rationale for changes in observation levels
  • Cadet trainee treated as supernumerary staff and allocated patient loads inappropriately
  • Nurse-in-charge assigned multiple competing responsibilities limiting availability for supervision

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Develop policies to ensure appropriate skill mix in nursing staff within mental health units to enable proper patient engagement and observations
  2. Develop practices and procedures to ensure identification and communication by all mental health clinical staff of the rationale for setting and/or changing patient observation status and levels
  3. Develop policies clearly identifying the nurse assigned responsibility for conduct and recording of patient engagement and observations, with clear identification in patient health care record
  4. Develop policies to ensure responsible nurse documents observations when they occur, avoiding 'block recording' practice
  5. Develop and maintain regular ongoing education programs for development and maintenance of procedural knowledge and nursing skill sets relevant to mental health patient engagements and observations
  6. Develop and maintain auditing program designed to test compliance with NSW Health Policy Directive on Engagement and Observation in Mental Health Inpatient Units and local procedures
  7. Develop and maintain policies to ensure results of auditing process inform ongoing education programs related to compliance with observation policies
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.