undetermined causes, in the course of being restrained by members of the NSW Police Force
AI-generated summary
Roberto Laudisio Curti, a 21-year-old Brazilian, died on 18 March 2012 during police restraint in Sydney after consuming LSD which induced a psychotic state. After a convenience store incident was misclassified as an armed robbery, multiple police officers pursued and restrained him using Tasers (at least 7 drive stuns), OC spray (3 cans), and body weight while he was on the ground and handcuffed. Medical experts found no single cause of death but agreed his death was not coincidental. The coroner found the police use of force was excessive, reckless and abusive, particularly after he was restrained. Key clinical lessons include: recognising drug-induced psychosis requiring de-escalation not force; understanding positional asphyxia risks when multiple officers restrain prone individuals; avoiding multiple Taser applications to handcuffed persons; and implementing communication protocols for mental health presentations to police.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
psychiatrytoxicologyforensic medicinecardiologyemergency medicine
LSD-induced acute psychosis with paranoia and fear
misclassification of convenience store incident as armed robbery leading to pursuit
excessive use of Tasers in drive stun mode
excessive use of OC spray
multiple officers applying body weight during restraint of prone individual
failure to recognise mental health presentation
junior and inexperienced officers with Tasers
poor leadership and failure to de-escalate by senior officer
lack of monitoring for positional asphyxia during restraint
Coroner's recommendations
That the conduct of Officers Barling, Cooper, Lim, Edmondson and Ralph in their actions during the pursuit and restraint of Roberto Laudisio Curti be considered for disciplinary charges
That the actions of police during the pursuit and restraint of Roberto Laudisio Curti be referred to the Police Integrity Commission
That there be an immediate review of the contents of the relevant NSW Police Standard Operating Procedures and associated training relating to the use of Taser, OC spray, handcuffing, restraint and positional asphyxia to ensure officers are aware of the dangers of positional asphyxia, multiple use of Tasers and drive stun mode, multiple use of OC spray
Ensure that guidance provided to officers is clear and consistent, in particular removing the term exigent circumstances
Review the criteria for the use of Tasers
Consider imposing limitations on the use of Taser in certain circumstances
Consider prohibiting the use of Tasers drive stun mode, other than where officers are defending themselves from attack
Improve training techniques and education in the appropriate and/or prohibited use of all force options
Consider whether Probationary officers should continue to be authorised to carry Tasers
Ensure that the safe management of risks of asphyxia by crush, restraint or position are included in SOPs wherever use of force must be applied
Review communication procedures to ensure that signs of mental disturbance in any person the subject of a police report be communicated, and officers trained to respond accordingly
Examine NSW Police VKG procedures to ensure accurate categorisation of any incident reported
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.