Coronial
WAhospital

Inquest into the Death of Laura Marguerite Sinclair

Deceased

Laura Marguerite Sinclair

Demographics

31y, female

Date of death

2002-07-12

Finding date

2005-12-09

Cause of death

Post-partum Haemorrhage associated with Amniotic Fluid Embolism and Uterine Hypotonia

AI-generated summary

Laura Marguerite Sinclair, 31-year-old primigravida, died from post-partum haemorrhage associated with amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) and uterine hypotonia. She underwent emergency caesarean section for foetal distress at Peel Health Campus, experiencing heavy blood loss (estimated 1500ml). Although initially stable post-operatively, she re-bled significantly (1000ml) within hours. Critical clinical opportunities were missed: coagulation studies were not performed despite massive transfusion requirements; Dr I. did not fully appreciate midwives' concerning vital signs when telephoned at 10:25pm and ordered transfusion without ensuring discontinuation of concurrent Syntocinon infusion; Dr K., when inserting a second cannula, was not adequately informed of the patient's hypotension and deteriorating condition; and no Medical Emergency Team (MET) was called despite clear clinical triggers. The deceased deteriorated into shock and was transferred to KEMH then emergently to Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, where she arrested and could not be resuscitated. The coroner found the death arose from natural causes but identified significant communication and escalation failures.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

obstetricsanaesthesiaemergency medicineintensive caremidwifery

Error types

diagnosticcommunicationsystemdelay

Drugs involved

pethidinemetoclopramideoxytocinprostaglandin f2asalbutamolfresh frozen plasma

Clinical conditions

amniotic fluid embolismpost-partum haemorrhageuterine hypotoniadisseminated intravascular coagulopathyfoetal distressmaternal shockhypovolaemiarespiratory distress

Procedures

artificial rupture of membranescaesarean sectionepidural insertioncannula insertionblood transfusionmanual ventilationre-laparotomy

Contributing factors

  • Amniotic fluid embolism
  • Uterine hypotonia/atony
  • Heavy post-partum haemorrhage (estimated 4 litres total blood loss)
  • Failure to perform coagulation studies despite massive blood loss
  • Failure to fully communicate patient's unstable vital signs to consulting obstetrician
  • Failure to appreciate severity of patient's condition by emergency doctor inserting cannula
  • Lack of Medical Emergency Team (MET) activation despite clinical triggers
  • Delayed recognition of amniotic fluid embolism as differential diagnosis
  • Inadequate communication regarding patient's critical status to receiving facility (KEMH)
  • Transfer to inappropriate facility without intensive care ventilation capacity

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Implementation of 24-hour Medical Emergency Team (MET) with pre-determined clinical triggers to enable nurses to escalate care independently of treating consultant
  2. Increased clinician awareness of amniotic fluid embolism as differential diagnosis in post-partum haemorrhage, particularly with coagulopathy features
  3. Full blood count and coagulation screening should be undertaken immediately after significant post-partum haemorrhage to guide transfusion management
  4. When consulting obstetricians are telephoned regarding unstable patients, they should make active enquiries about clinical observations if information is not fully registered
  5. Treating obstetricians should clinically assess deteriorating patients rather than relying solely on emergency department doctor performing limited procedures
  6. Improved communication protocols between referring and receiving hospitals regarding patient acuity and critical care requirements
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.