Peritonitis following surgical procedure to the urinary bladder, due to infected bladder biopsy sites with Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis
AI-generated summary
Cheryl Lee Edmiston, a healthy 41-year-old woman, died of peritonitis and sepsis following minor bladder procedures (cystoscopy, hydrodilatation, and biopsy) at Joondalup Health Campus on 14 February 2003. The biopsies were performed by an inexperienced registrar, Dr V., under supervision of urologist Mr Robert Thomas. The biopsies were significantly deeper than appropriate, with at least one penetrating into the peritoneal cavity and becoming infected. Critical delays occurred in recognising the deterioration, providing antibiotics, and escalating care. The patient was not reviewed by medical staff for 22 hours post-procedure despite warning signs including fever, abdominal pain, absent urine output, and abnormal bladder scans. When antibiotics were finally ordered at 10am on day two, they were poorly charted and not administered promptly; gentamicin was not given until 6:30pm, over 8 hours later. Mr Thomas failed to attend the hospital despite concerning imaging findings and multiple telephone updates; he was unavailable when finally needed at midnight due to a social engagement at a restaurant with alcohol consumption. The coroner found the death entirely preventable with competent supervision and timely treatment, and referred all three doctors to the Medical Board.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Excessively deep bladder biopsies performed by inexperienced registrar without adequate supervision
Failure to review patient post-operatively for 22 hours despite deterioration
Delayed administration of antibiotics (8+ hours after ordering)
Poor writing and communication of antibiotic orders on medication chart
Failure to insert urinary catheter promptly despite orders
Delayed initiation of intravenous fluids
Failure of supervising urologist to attend hospital despite serious findings
Failure to escalate to intensive care unit when indicated
Unavailability of senior clinician due to social commitments and alcohol consumption
Administrative confusion regarding patient disposition (expected discharge vs ward admission)
Failure of nursing staff to escalate concerns appropriately
Absence of clear handover and communication between medical staff
Coroner's recommendations
All hospitals in Western Australia should conduct routine audits of Medication Charts to ensure they are correctly written up and that newly appointed or transferred medical practitioners are familiar with the particular charts in use and know how to correctly fill them out
Medication Charts should be written up to indicate when first medications are to be given and when regular doses are to be given, specifically indicating whether there is to be a variation in regular delivery immediately after the first dose
Joondalup Health Campus should put in place a Morbidity-Mortality Conference Procedure to help identify patterns of complications and aid in early identification of impaired surgeons who may benefit from available help
In future contracts entered into by hospitals in Western Australia with consultants and other medical practitioners, terms and conditions of appointment should specifically require provision of information regarding any medical condition, including psychiatric diagnoses, which could be relevant to the performance of that practitioner
Hospital contracts should require provision of information about any medication, such as anti-depressant medication, which could impact on the ability of the practitioner in question
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.