Inquest into the Suspected Death of Peter James GUIDERA
Deceased
Peter James GUIDERA
Demographics
58y, male
Coroner
Coroner Jenkin
Date of death
1998-05-08
Finding date
2025-04-17
Cause of death
unascertained
AI-generated summary
Peter James Guidera, a 58-year-old man with a history of depression, suicidal ideation, and previous suicide attempts, disappeared on 8 May 1998 from Narrogin, Western Australia, shortly after receiving a distressing phone call regarding his divorce settlement. He left work in an agitated and upset state and has never been located despite comprehensive police searches and proof-of-life checks. Evidence suggests he likely died by suicide, though his body was never found. The coroner's finding highlights the importance of recognising suicide risk in patients with depression, recent major life stressors (marriage breakdown), and previous suicide attempts or ideation. Mental health assessment and intervention at critical moments—such as during marriage dissolution or financial crises—may have been lifesaving. Family and employers noted his previous expressions of suicidal intent and method specificity.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.
Specialties
psychiatrygeneral practice
Drugs involved
antidepressant medication
Clinical conditions
depressionsuicidal ideation
Contributing factors
depression
suicidal ideation and previous suicide attempts
marriage breakdown and divorce stress
financial difficulties
recent major life stressors
agitated and distressed mental state at time of disappearance
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.