Inquest into the Death of Petya Evgenieva PETROVA-CIZEK
Deceased
Petya Evgenieva PETROVA-CIZEK
Demographics
41y, female
Date of death
2020-12-16
Finding date
2024-03-07
Cause of death
ligature compression of the neck (hanging)
AI-generated summary
Petya, a 41-year-old Bulgarian-born woman, died by ligature compression of the neck while an involuntary psychiatric patient at Bentley Health Service Ward 6 on 16 December 2020. She had been admitted following acute psychotic symptoms with paranoia and suicidal ideation. The coroner found multiple inadequacies in her care: failure to remove potential ligature items (shoelaces) on admission despite policy; insufficient medical reviews by senior psychiatrists; inadequate risk escalation after violent incidents and expressions of suicidality; failure to convene requested family meetings; poor handover processes when the consultant psychiatrist took leave; superficial 'rounding' observations; and premature risk downgrade from high to low without documented justification. Ward 6 was under-resourced with acutely unwell patients. Although suicide remains difficult to predict, these systemic failures represented missed opportunities for enhanced care. The coroner made recommendations regarding ligature remediation funding, access to triage documentation during assessments, and nurse-patient allocation ratios.
AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes.
Specialties
Error types
Drugs involved
Contributing factors
- failure to remove shoelaces on admission despite policy
- insufficient frequency of medical reviews by senior psychiatrists
- failure to escalate care following Code Black incident and expressions of suicidality
- inadequate risk assessment and documentation
- failure to convene family meetings despite repeated requests
- inadequate handover when consultant psychiatrist took leave
- poor quality observations (rounding) without therapeutic engagement
- risk rating downgraded without justification
- unsubstantiated allegations against husband limiting his involvement in care
- high ward acuity with inadequate staffing
- lack of formal clinical supervision systems
- communication failure regarding patient expressions of suicidality between advocate and nurse
- failure to document and investigate red marks on neck reported by husband
Coroner's recommendations
- East Metropolitan Health Service should ensure sufficient funding is made available so that remediation work to address all low, medium, and high ligature risks in its mental health facilities (identified during internal and external audits) is completed as promptly as possible, as a matter of utmost urgency
- East Metropolitan Health Service should take immediate steps to ensure that at all of its mental health facilities, clinicians assessing patients for possible admission have (at the time of that assessment) access to that patient's Mental Health Triage documentation, and any relevant outpatient notes, whether in hard copy or by way of an electronic medical record system
- East Metropolitan Health Service should review the current system of allocating two patients to each nurse working on Ward 6 at Bentley Hospital. The review should consider whether the current allocation is appropriate in all circumstances, and whether the available mechanisms to assess patient acuity are properly able to ensure that in each case, the nurse to patient allocations are correct
Full text
Related cases
Source and disclaimer
This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.
Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. All court orders for redaction and non-publication are respected; documents with technically defective redaction have been excluded from the database entirely. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.
Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction —