Coronial
WAaged care

Inquest into the Death of Kathryn PAPANASTASIOU

Deceased

Kathryn PAPANASTASIOU

Demographics

74y, female

Coroner

Coroner Jenkin

Date of death

2020-03-15

Finding date

2023-10-11

Cause of death

Fractures of the legs, with terminal palliative care, in an elderly lady with multiple co-morbidities

AI-generated summary

Ms Papanastasiou, a 74-year-old aged care resident confined to a wheelchair, died from bilateral femoral fractures sustained when she fell from her wheelchair during sudden bus braking. The wheelchair was secured using only a shoulder strap, contrary to the applicable Australian Standard requiring a three-point restraint (pelvic lap-sash plus shoulder strap). The driver, under time pressure and distracted by a verbally abusive visitor, was unable to locate proper lap-sash straps due to poor equipment storage organisation, then made a clinical decision to proceed with inadequate restraint rather than remove the resident from the vehicle. The critical failures were: inadequate restraint system, failure to conduct proper risk assessment when standard restraint was unavailable, lack of mandatory supervision on the bus, and driver distraction. Key learning: transport safety requires strict adherence to standards, proper risk assessment, clear policies, and adequate staffing.

AI-generated summary and tagging — may contain inaccuracies; refer to original finding for legal purposes. Report an inaccuracy.

Specialties

geriatric medicineorthopaedic surgerytrauma surgeryemergency medicine

Error types

systemproceduralcommunicationdelay

Clinical conditions

multiple comorbiditiescongestive heart failurecognitive impairmenttype 2 diabetes with neuropathyobstructive sleep apnoeahypertensionobesitymultiple system atrophyfracture bilateral femursfracture right tibia and fibularespiratory acidosissecondary anaemiahypotensionacute kidney injuryhyperkalaemia

Procedures

wheelchair transport and securinghydraulic hoist loading

Contributing factors

  • Wheelchair secured using single shoulder strap contrary to Australian Standard requiring three-point restraint
  • Failure to locate proper lap-sash restraint straps due to poor equipment storage and organisation
  • Failure to conduct proper risk assessment when standard restraint was unavailable
  • Driver time pressure and distraction from verbal aggression by third party
  • Driver decision to proceed with inadequate restraint rather than remove resident from vehicle
  • Lack of mandatory second staff member to monitor residents during transport
  • Driver glancing at mobile phone navigation app requiring downward eye movement
  • Sudden heavy braking event by driver
  • Inadequate resident assessment for suitability of transport given mobility and postural control issues

Coroner's recommendations

  1. Amend policy documentation to make clear that when a resident is being transported in a wheelchair, a three-point restraint system (consisting of a pelvic lap sash and a shoulder strap) must be used to secure the resident
  2. To ensure straps are serviceable and available: clearly label each set of straps; conduct regular audits of straps in each vehicle; amend policy to require all straps be stowed neatly in pairs after trips
  3. Amend policy documentation to mandate annual mandatory refresher training for all staff responsible for driving vehicles used to transport residents
  4. Strongly urge that user guides and relevant guidance signs in community access vehicles remain visible when wheelchairs are being transported (bench seat should not obscure guidance)
Full text

Source and disclaimer

This page reproduces or summarises information from publicly available findings published by Australian coroners' courts. Coronial is an independent educational resource and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of any coronial court or government body.

Content may be incomplete, reformatted, or summarised. Some material may have been redacted or restricted by court order or privacy requirements. Always refer to the original court publication for the authoritative record.

Copyright in original materials remains with the relevant government jurisdiction. AI-generated summaries and tagging are for educational purposes only, may contain inaccuracies, and must not be treated as legal documents. We welcome feedback for correction — report an inaccuracy here.